PDA

View Full Version : THAT'S what I call anti theft!


Navaron
2003-06-16, 11:16 PM
http://www.local6.com/news/2272794/detail.html

Business Owner Chases, Runs Over Robbery Suspects In Hummer
Two Suspects In Critical Condition

POSTED: 1:56 p.m. EDT June 16, 2003
UPDATED: 10:52 p.m. EDT June 16, 2003

A business owner in Phoenix, Arizona took matters into his own hands after a group of men robbed his business, according to a Local 6 News report.


SURVEY
Should a business owner who ran over a group of robbery suspects in his Hummer face charges?
Yes
No
Not Sure



Results | Disclaimer




Police say three armed suspects walked into the Mr. Insurance building in Phoenix and demanded money. A fourth suspect was in the getaway car, according to the report.

Investigators said after the suspects left with the store's money, the co-owner jumped into his Hummer and chased after the suspects.

Police said that the man, identified only as Peter, followed the suspects through a neighborhood and eventually caught up with them. He then rolled his Hummer over their car.

Two of the suspects were taken to the hospital in critical condition.

The two other suspects managed to get away but police later caught them as well.

It is not known if Peter will face charges.

Mtx
2003-06-16, 11:21 PM
Hah hah Ilike it!

He should not be charged. They were armed and probably had the intent to rob another buisness later anyway. That was a public service if nothing else.

EineBeBoP
2003-06-16, 11:28 PM
If 1 or more of the robbers die, then maybe a night or 2 in jail. If they both survive, then absolutally not.

Prowler
2003-06-16, 11:34 PM
Originally posted by EineBeBoP
If 1 or more of the robbers die, then maybe a night or 2 in jail. If they both survive, then absolutally not.



I concur.

Mtx
2003-06-16, 11:37 PM
*grumble grumble*

softy liberals

They brought it on themselves.. end of story.

NightWalker XI
2003-06-17, 01:18 AM
He will probably be arrested, there was this time once where this thief was about to rob a house, but he fell through the kitchen roof, he fell on top of a knife which went right through his leg, he then sued the house owner for personal damage or whatever and won, even though he was gonna thieve her house...

:rolleyes:

The law system = fucked up

Seer
2003-06-17, 01:31 AM
"Choice Votes Percent of 5928 votes

Yes 625 11%

No 5107 86%

Not Sure 196 3%"

The people have spoken! If you rob someone, you surrender your right not to be crushed by their massive car.

Onizuka
2003-06-17, 01:33 AM
i think he should not be arrested just have to wash hummers every day for a month as punishment

Jaged
2003-06-17, 01:55 AM
Lol, like public service!:lol:

Squeeky
2003-06-17, 03:31 AM
:rofl: owned!

NightWalker XI
2003-06-17, 03:38 AM
In South Africa it is allowed for you to outfit your vehicle with something called "The Blaster" it costs US$655 and basically it shoots 6 foot high flames from two nossles below the car and over the door, so fi a thief is tryign to break into at a red light he is gonan get burnt.

This guy didn't get his car stolen but it says anti theft...and I remembered this lol

Seer
2003-06-17, 08:35 AM
I just wish there was a bigger picture of the hummer on top of that car. It would make a great "Owned."

PR24
2003-06-17, 10:12 AM
This should be in the new HUMMER commercial.

"Did you get robbed?" " Well run their ass over" "introducing the ass new 2004 Hummer"

:rofl:

xuur
2003-06-17, 12:54 PM
he will undoubtedly be charged with something.

the criminals left without harm to anyone (at least none noted in the article) and were headed away from his location. No further harm would have been done to him or his business.

His persuit and assault were in legal terms, unjustified and premeditated (ie: he had time to think about it and decide otherwise). He had time to call the police, he had time to tell them where the criminals were, and they (the bad guys) where not threatening him in any way (none noted in the article) at the time of the vehicular assault. The criminals had left, he and his business/co-workers were in no danger, violence was unnecessary in the eyes of the law.


NOT that I agree...but you know this is hardly the last he'll hear of it.

sad but true