Go here, and fight internet tax-

[Navaron]

http://www.nointernettax.org/index.cfm?Page=ActionItems

Please use this link to voice your opposition to internet taxes by emailing your Senator. It's very easy to do, and if you please, send the link to everyone in your address book.

[Sentrosi]

Exercise my right to free speech by e-mailing this to my senator: Done

Exercise my right to bear arms: Done

Exercise my right to be a proactive citizen with said arms: In process

Internet Tax is evil. Information should never, EVER, be taxed.

[Zodiac]

If you post on anyother forums it would be great if you could post this there too. :D

[EarlyDawn]

Information should be free. Or else you get Government AIs crawling out of the woodwork fighting for their freedom.

...We're so screwed.

[Incompetent]

Sent one off, probably a useless gesture but no reason not to.

[Hamma]

It doesent matter what I send my senator, they will do whatever they want anyway. It isnt about what the people want anymore :p

[Nimbus]

True, but I'm sending anyway.

[EarlyDawn]

I don't really understand how this would work. The internet is a noncentralized, international system. How can you "tax" the U.S. portion?

Feel free to use vast technical terms, I'll probably be able to follow.

[Rbstr]

you could tax it because a company has to provide the email service( or a home user with a server and a domian), and E-mail is all traceable. and companies that make the software (like Micrasoft) would have to right it into thier software

[Happy lil Elf]

What exactly are they proposing a tax on? The ability to use the internet? On ISPs? What?

[EarlyDawn]

Yeah, some more information on what is being taxed, exactly, would be nice.

I remember Hillary Clinton was trying to put a $.25 tax on every email sent. Talk about totally reaming the telecommunication and ISP industry.

[Spee]

Tax is going on every e-transaction made, ISP service, and a bunch of other sheeit.

[Squeeky]

Signed.

[Dharkbayne]

that won't pass, I mean,buddy jesus, think of all the ppl who use the internet, noone wants to pay for that shit

[Navaron]

that won't pass, I mean,buddy jesus, think of all the ppl who use the internet, noone wants to pay for that shit


You realized your phone usage is taxed right? I think more people use the phone than net.

[Dharkbayne]

Ahhh fuck, forgot about that "phone" thing

[Setari]

what is this phone you speak of?
In my native land, we have only high-speed custom computers with top of the line Internet connections.
plz enlighten me on the phone device ;) :p

[Happy lil Elf]

Dorgan, that motherfucking panty stain, represents my state in the senate and he introduces this bullshit?!?

Fuck. Now I have to actually get involved in the next election to try and get his sorry ass voted out. Sadly it will probably never happen. He brings home money for farmers and guess who makes up most of North Dakota's population. >_<

[Navaron]

Internet Access Tax Battle Heats Up in Senate



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. senator said on Thursday that he would hold up a massive year-end spending bill if it included a ban on Internet-access taxes that he and several colleagues fear would harm state and local finances.

Delaware Sen. Thomas Carper, a Democrat, told reporters he would try to keep the omnibus bill from coming to the Senate floor if the ban was included in its present form, which he said infringed on the rights of state and local governments to raise revenues.

"If we end up with just an awful ... provision I would certainly object to bringing the omnibus spending bill to the floor and I suspect others will join me," Carper told reporters after a news briefing on the issue.

Although Senate rules offer many ways for individual senators to hold up bills they disagree with, it would be hard for Carper to do more than delay the bill for a few days.


Colleagues said they hoped to reach a deal with lawmakers on the other side of the issue before matters reached a head.


The ban is meant to replace a 1998 moratorium that kept state and local government from imposing taxes on the monthly fees Internet providers such as EarthLink Inc (ELNK). charge their customers. The moratorium expired on Nov. 1.


As written, the replacement measure would permanently ban those taxes as well as taxes on high-speed cable and DSL services not covered under the original moratorium.


The new version, which cleared the House of Representatives in September, would also eliminate access taxes that were in place in some states before 1998. Senate leaders brought the bill to the floor several weeks ago but pulled it back after it became apparent the measure might not pass easily.


BROADLY WORDED BILL


State and local governments fear the legislation is worded so broadly that it would restrict them from collecting all manner of other taxes on the telecommunications industry.


They say it could cost them as much as $9 billion in tax revenues a year by 2006 as phone calls, music sales and other activities migrate to the Internet.


The Congressional Budget Office estimates these jurisdictions would lose $195 million that year but said the true cost of the provision could not be determined and could be much higher.


Calling the ban proposal an unfunded mandate on states and a massive tax break for the telecommunications industry, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said he and his colleagues had proposed a compromise two-year ban.


The compromise would ban access taxes both on DSL and in states previously allowed to tax Internet access services.


He said there was also a chance that the two sides could simply agree to extending the terms of the expired moratorium for a few months while they agreed on what should come afterward.


But Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen, whose state boasts a large high-tech business community and who supports the permanent ban proposal, said he could not accept an extension either for a few months or two years.


"Senator Allen does not believe a two-year extension provides either consumers or businesses with adequate stability to plan future significant buildout of broadband," his spokesman said, adding that Allen's goal was to keep industry costs down to make Internet access affordable for all.


A spokeswoman for Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, said Wyden was similarly unmoved by proposals presented thus far. Extension of the terms of the previous ban simply gave states more time to institute new taxes on the Internet, she said.





� Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd.


11/20/2003 19:40
--------------------------------

It's still very real.

[SecondRaven]

I hear more about "what i do wont matter" "my vote wont matter" "Im only one person"...these quotes are from people who dont really care...you need to send your senator a letter. One letter from you is another letter that is filling his mailbox; and the more mail he gets the more he will notice us and be forced to lissen to us.

[Dharkbayne]

Actually I doubt the senator sees any of these letters,,,