View Full Version : the graphics might beat HALOS
R KELLY
2003-01-26, 03:24 AM
the graphics in PS might beat HALO and possibly HALO2
TOO bad halo isnt a maasive multiplayer game
Ludio
2003-01-26, 03:37 AM
I think it will have better graphics than HALO before GeforceFx comes out. As for HALO 2, I cant say because I havent seen any screenshots, but I imagine it will be about equal.
Of course this doesnt really matter at all because the graphics are only going to be part of the game, the gameplay is going to kickass, and HALO is only on the Xbox, while this is only on the PC. (And yes I know HALO is coming out on PC at the end of the year, two years too late)
Lexington_Steele
2003-01-26, 03:51 AM
It will be better than Halo if your system can run it to its limits.
I don't think it will be prettier than Halo 2. I have seen some early Halo 2 screens and they look real nice.
jamikey
2003-01-26, 04:42 AM
some of the screen shots from halo2 look at least as good as the ones from doom3 and thats saying alot.
Squeeky
2003-01-26, 05:29 AM
Omg its R. Kelly, Damn pedo :D
Zanzibar
2003-01-26, 06:46 AM
dont you mean matt kelly? <cof> disgraced peado with 56 bvideos of cartoons in his summer house...need i say more<cof>
RabidPlatypus
2003-01-26, 09:36 AM
what's the point in comparing it to halo? Many games have already surprassed it....
TeamR
2003-01-26, 11:05 AM
Really.....Who cares?
I'm getting tired of hearing Halo around here. These two games are barely competing with each other. Halo is pushing limits on the console side, and Planetside is pushing limits on the PC side (which instantly makes it better :D). If you want to play a really cool FPS, go buy halo or halo2 when its released. If you want to play a revolutionary one-of-a-kind title, get Planetside.
This is the Planetside community. Take your Halo shit somewhere else. That also goes for WW2ol, Everquest, SWG, CS, and most definitly TRIBES
HotDogTommy
2003-01-26, 11:49 AM
I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.
And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.
TeamR
2003-01-26, 12:04 PM
Originally posted by HotDogTommy
I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.
And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.
technology is not limited to graphics, friend.
JohnClark
2003-01-26, 12:35 PM
Originally posted by HotDogTommy
I'm still not sure how anyone can compare a normal TV with a computer monitor. I have an xbox and EVERYTHING looks better on my PC.
And, incidntally, I don't see how PS is pushing the limits of PC technology (correct me if I'm wrong here) , since the requirements are only a 1 gig processor and a 56k modem.
And also because most games have minimum specs far lower than that.
Ouroboros
2003-01-26, 01:02 PM
From what I got out of the Gamespot videos, the graphics of PS is really nice... Screenshots do the game no credit. :(
Format
2003-01-26, 01:07 PM
Dont forget that things are still being done to improve the graphics. They still have things to touch up, though they probably wont be drastic changes. Anyways, the graphics arent the most important thing in a game.
Camping Carl
2003-01-26, 02:34 PM
This is the Planetside community. Take your Halo shit somewhere else. That also goes for WW2ol, Everquest, SWG, CS, and most definitly TRIBES
:stupid:
FraBaktos
2003-01-26, 03:30 PM
I didn't even like Halo... the auto aim was too much for me. But the graphics were good.
Lexington_Steele
2003-01-26, 03:49 PM
There is no auto-aim when you play Halo on ledgendary.
FraBaktos
2003-01-26, 03:57 PM
I've beaten the game on legendary I know. And there is always a touch of auto aim in multiplayer that you can't turn off.
Zatrais
2003-01-26, 03:58 PM
I wonder why the GF FX is mentioned up there.... GF FX isn't some magical card that will instantly make every game look better tho some seem to think so hehe. (well unless you count AA and FA but thats "older" tech)
GF FX won't do annything special to PS since PS isn't using anny of the fun DX 9 things.... heck, from the looks of it PS dosn't even use pr pixel shaders and thats dx8.1
From the looks of it PS is using the DX 8 features.
Course, none of this has been confirmed but hey that dosn't mean a person can't analyze hehe =).
CDaws
2003-01-26, 03:58 PM
Kick ass graphics, check. Highend requirments, check. 1 to 5000 players on a single server, OMG, check, hell yes. Thousands of players on the same server, on the same map, at the same time is what you get out of Planetside. Not to mention an FPS of this magnitude has never been done. That's pushing the limits and sets new standards. Graphics on PC games will almost always look better just because you can always upgrade you vid gard for a better one. Show me a console that you can that with. The devs have to deal with the built in cards for the consoles, so they are limited to what they can do.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.