View Full Version : is the AMD athlon 64 3400 just as good for OCing as the fx-51?
HunterKiller
2004-03-22, 03:48 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Rbstr
2004-03-22, 04:10 PM
Electro knows AMD i do not
Electrofreak
2004-03-23, 02:54 PM
well... not really. The 3400+ has a locked multiplier, while the FX-51 does not. So technically, the FX-51 is better at OCing because you can up your multipliers.
I've got an AMD 64 3200+, and that locked multi is a bit of a pain. I can only OC my CPU a couple hundred mhz. However, a recent revision of AMD 64 chips has been released, the "CG" revision, which supposedly can clock higher. I really don't know that much about the CG chips, but I'm thinking the FX-51 can still clock higher than it.
Baneblade
2004-03-23, 03:30 PM
Can the FX-53 clock higher than the 51?
Phaelon
2004-03-23, 04:52 PM
Yes
Baneblade
2004-03-23, 04:56 PM
Awesome
Electrofreak
2004-03-25, 02:00 AM
the FX-53 is exactly the same as the FX-51, except that it runs stock at 2400 instead of the FX-51's stock 2200.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.