BF: Modern Combat

[I Hate Pants]

http://www.eagames.com/news/bf_mc_041504.jsp

Your thoughts?

[SilverLord]

Maybe..

[Fragmatic]

No.

[I Hate Pants]

Please compile your thougths into one word or less. Thank you.

[EineBeBoP]

Hell yes.
Hope it has multiplayer support or it will suck.

[Derfud]

I hope it is also made for the PC, and doesn't have as bad graphics as the ones in the shown screenshots, otherwise it will suck major ass.

[EineBeBoP]

Well from what I hear thoes are early screens.
Should get better

[Fragmatic]

This game will not work.

Why?

1. It's an FPS on a console - Control Suckage++
2. Console players want shiny graphics - PS2 rendering all that = suckage.
3. It's EA making it, so no doubt they will rush the game, and try and patch it on release day, but seeing as it's on the PS2, you could only patch it with the HDD and intarweb, so to play you'd have to have the HDD and the intarweb.

[/thread]

[I Hate Pants]

Yeah. Im starting to think this game will NOT be da shiznit :no:

[UncleDynamite]

As Frag said, console = bad. If it were designed for PC, then I'd have no doubts that it would be a great game. Maybe a nice addition to the Battlefield series once Bf:V has run its course.

[Rbstr]

^ agreed

It would be cool to have a modern combat game, but the problem is no modern engagments are realy conventional, they could make up a fictional WW3 of somekind, like the USSR didn't dissolve, with major land battles so tanks and things can be used as they were originaly meant to be(excpet for the newest stuff out) on the plains of europe fighitng a Russian invasion.

[Derfud]

I've always wanted a game like that. I suggested having that kind of stuff in DC back in the early versions, and DC 0.7 seemed so far away. The devs said "possibly".

[AztecWarrior]

This game will not work.

Why?

1. It's an FPS on a console - Control Suckage++
2. Console players want shiny graphics - PS2 rendering all that = suckage.
3. It's EA making it, so no doubt they will rush the game, and try and patch it on release day, but seeing as it's on the PS2, you could only patch it with the HDD and intarweb, so to play you'd have to have the HDD and the intarweb.

[/thread]
Had I said this, the usual Aztec=Flamer propaganda would be thrown around. So, I'll just say "What he said."

[Dharkbayne]

Stfu aztec you flaming cuban.


This game is gonna blow. Mark my words.

[Setari]

i no longer trust ea's development team in anything but sports games, which they do quite well.

[Fragmatic]

i no longer trust ea's development team in anything but sports games, which they do quite well.

It's in the game.

[ghost018]

PS2? :rofl:

[Fragmatic]

Doesn't bother me.

I got a PS2, XBOX, GBA, GP32, PSION Series 3 (3c to be precise), and 3 PC's :D

[Everay]

i no longer trust ea's development team in anything but sports games, which they do quite well.


however, i hate sports games.

[SDM]

however, i hate sports games.
I agree. The new boxing one they just put out looks like it might be kinda fun though.

[Phaden]

Well dont knock EA quite so fast. I mean comon, look at BFV and how lag free it is, ohh and also the fact that the bots never seem to see you through the foliage. Or take Desert Combat, thats a great game. Oh. Wait that wasnt really them, hmmmm perhaps hees right.

[Jaged]

How can you all hate EA? They just came out with BFV. That game is pure ownage.

[1024]

hate console FPSs.

[Hamma]

PS2 only wtf?

Are they only doing fucking WWI and ancient wars on PC? SOmething against modern warfare on the PC?

[Sputty]

PS2 only wtf?

Are they only doing fucking WWI and ancient wars on PC? SOmething against modern warfare on the PC?
EA is stupid.
End

Also, sport games are the lowest type of game. Anime porn is higher than sports games

The new BF will be good for people who want a console FPS, but I don't plan on touching it with a 10 foot hamma pole

[Hezzy]

This game will suck.

1. Crappy graphics because the PS2 will need to render other things, such as vehicles, etc.
2. Can't patch it. The only way EA barely succeeds is through patching.
3. It's not on PC
4. It hasn't got Brits in it.

[Everay]

thats another thing, EA owned westwood right? what did they do? they closed em down, how can you close westwood down, its like closing Black isle you stupid fucking Interplay! we make games for gamers by gamers my ass!

[Sputty]

thats another thing, EA owned westwood right? what did they do? they closed em down, how can you close westwood down, its like closing Black isle you stupid fucking Interplay! we make games for gamers by gamers my ass!
Indeed
Westwood, the makers of some of the best RTSes ever, and the first true RTS in the way we know of it. Closing Westwood was a travesty

[Neon Apocalypse]

it will blow no doubt

btw is trauma studios in on this?

[EarlyDawn]

It's going to be a gimped version of Renegade :lol:

[TheN00b]

Nah, FPS's and, for that matter, all games, suck on console. Except Halo and SC:II

[JetRaiden]

I bet it can only support like 8 players, and has like 640x480 resolution.

put it on PC or DEATH to EA!

come on, PS2? Have you seen MoH on that thing? its a mockery of allied assault.