Most Offensive Sig ever?

[Bighoss]

lol I just found this and thought it was kind of funny... Please don't ban me if this crosses the line I'll just remove it right away.

shit not working hold on

edit: lol WTF it just isn't working on this post

[Khronos]

shit not working hold on

GG :rofl:

[Khronos]

i see it now, and i laugh. :rofl:


and im glad this thread isn't pointless. :lol:

[Squeeky]

THIS THREAD IS NOW ABOUT ONE LEGGED CHINCHILLAS WITH ASTHMA

[Bighoss]

Those are the best because you can chase them all you want and they can't escape and they wear themselves down to the point where they suffocate and die!

IT WORKS IN THIS POST OMFG!!!

I'm just gonna remove it, its not teh funneh

this was it

http://web.njit.edu/~ac75/pimphitler.gif

[Squeeky]

This thread is now about The Nicomachean Ethics.

We must not expect more precision than the subject-matter admits. The student should have reached years of discretion.

Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject-matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts. Now fine and just actions, which political science investigates, admit of much variety and fluctuation of opinion, so that they may be thought to exist only by convention, and not by nature. And goods also give rise to a similar fluctuation because they bring harm to many people; for before now men have been undone by reason of their wealth, and others by reason of their courage. We must be content, then, in speaking of such subjects and with such premisses to indicate the truth roughly and in outline, and in speaking about things which are only for the most part true and with premisses of the same kind to reach conclusions that are no better. In the same spirit, therefore, should each type of statement be received; for it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proofs.

Now each man judges well the things he knows, and of these he is a good judge. And so the man who has been educated in a subject is a good judge of that subject, and the man who has received an all-round education is a good judge in general. Hence a young man is not a proper hearer of lectures on political science; for he is inexperienced in the actions that occur in life, but its discussions start from these and are about these; and, further, since he tends to follow his passions, his study will be vain and unprofitable, because the end aimed at is not knowledge but action. And it makes no difference whether he is young in years or youthful in character; the defect does not depend on time, but on his living, and pursuing each successive object, as passion directs. For to such persons, as to the incontinent, knowledge brings no profit; but to those who desire and act in accordance with a rational principle knowledge about such matters will be of great benefit.

These remarks about the student, the sort of treatment to be expected, and the purpose of the inquiry, may be taken as our preface.

It [the good] is generally agreed to be happiness, but there are various views as to what happiness is. What is required at the start is an unreasoned conviction about the facts, such as is produced by a good upbringing.

Let us resume our inquiry and state, in view of the fact that all knowledge and every pursuit aims at some good, what it is that we say political science aims at and what is the highest of all goods achievable by action. Verbally there is very general agreement; for both the general run of men and people of superior refinement say that it is happiness, and identify living well and doing well with being happy; but with regard to what happiness is they differ, and the many do not give the same account as the wise. For the former think it is some plain and obvious thing, like pleasure, wealth, or honour; they differ, however, from one another -- and often even the same man identifies it with different things, with health when he is ill, with wealth when he is poor; but, conscious of their ignorance, they admire those who proclaim some great ideal that is above their comprehension. Now some thought that apart from these many goods there is another which is self-subsistent and causes the goodness of all these as well. To examine all the opinions that have been held were perhaps somewhat fruitless; enough to examine those that are most prevalent or that seem to be arguable.

Let us not fail to notice, however, that there is a difference between arguments from and those to the first principles. For Plato, too, was right in raising this question and asking, as he used to do, 'are we on the way from or to the first principles?' There is a difference, as there is in a race-course between the course from the judges to the turning-point and the way back. For, while we must begin with what is known, things are objects of knowledge in two senses -- some to us, some without qualification. Presumably, then, we must begin with things known to us. Hence any one who is to listen intelligently to lectures about what is noble and just, and generally, about the subjects of political science must have been brought up in good habits. For the fact is the starting-point, and if this is sufficiently plain to him, he will not at the start need the reason as well; and the man who has been well brought up has or can easily get startingpoints. And as for him who neither has nor can get them, let him hear the words of Hesiod:

Far best is he who knows all things himself;
Good, he that hearkens when men counsel right;
But he who neither knows, nor lays to heart
Another's wisdom, is a useless wight.

[321]

I remember that sig from a long long time ago here at PSU.

[JetRaiden]

/me looks to see Forum Fire forming in the distance

[Bighoss]

This thread is now about The Nicomachean Ethics.

We must not expect more precision than the subject-matter admits. The student should have reached years of discretion.

Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject-matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts. Now fine and just actions, which political science investigates, admit of much variety and fluctuation of opinion, so that they may be thought to exist only by convention, and not by nature. And goods also give rise to a similar fluctuation because they bring harm to many people; for before now men have been undone by reason of their wealth, and others by reason of their courage. We must be content, then, in speaking of such subjects and with such premisses to indicate the truth roughly and in outline, and in speaking about things which are only for the most part true and with premisses of the same kind to reach conclusions that are no better. In the same spirit, therefore, should each type of statement be received; for it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proofs.

Now each man judges well the things he knows, and of these he is a good judge. And so the man who has been educated in a subject is a good judge of that subject, and the man who has received an all-round education is a good judge in general. Hence a young man is not a proper hearer of lectures on political science; for he is inexperienced in the actions that occur in life, but its discussions start from these and are about these; and, further, since he tends to follow his passions, his study will be vain and unprofitable, because the end aimed at is not knowledge but action. And it makes no difference whether he is young in years or youthful in character; the defect does not depend on time, but on his living, and pursuing each successive object, as passion directs. For to such persons, as to the incontinent, knowledge brings no profit; but to those who desire and act in accordance with a rational principle knowledge about such matters will be of great benefit.

These remarks about the student, the sort of treatment to be expected, and the purpose of the inquiry, may be taken as our preface.

It [the good] is generally agreed to be happiness, but there are various views as to what happiness is. What is required at the start is an unreasoned conviction about the facts, such as is produced by a good upbringing.

Let us resume our inquiry and state, in view of the fact that all knowledge and every pursuit aims at some good, what it is that we say political science aims at and what is the highest of all goods achievable by action. Verbally there is very general agreement; for both the general run of men and people of superior refinement say that it is happiness, and identify living well and doing well with being happy; but with regard to what happiness is they differ, and the many do not give the same account as the wise. For the former think it is some plain and obvious thing, like pleasure, wealth, or honour; they differ, however, from one another -- and often even the same man identifies it with different things, with health when he is ill, with wealth when he is poor; but, conscious of their ignorance, they admire those who proclaim some great ideal that is above their comprehension. Now some thought that apart from these many goods there is another which is self-subsistent and causes the goodness of all these as well. To examine all the opinions that have been held were perhaps somewhat fruitless; enough to examine those that are most prevalent or that seem to be arguable.

Let us not fail to notice, however, that there is a difference between arguments from and those to the first principles. For Plato, too, was right in raising this question and asking, as he used to do, 'are we on the way from or to the first principles?' There is a difference, as there is in a race-course between the course from the judges to the turning-point and the way back. For, while we must begin with what is known, things are objects of knowledge in two senses -- some to us, some without qualification. Presumably, then, we must begin with things known to us. Hence any one who is to listen intelligently to lectures about what is noble and just, and generally, about the subjects of political science must have been brought up in good habits. For the fact is the starting-point, and if this is sufficiently plain to him, he will not at the start need the reason as well; and the man who has been well brought up has or can easily get startingpoints. And as for him who neither has nor can get them, let him hear the words of Hesiod:

Far best is he who knows all things himself;
Good, he that hearkens when men counsel right;
But he who neither knows, nor lays to heart
Another's wisdom, is a useless wight.

Aristotle was smart :doh:

[Jennyboo]

probably over sig size

[Triggar]

Squeeky, Nicomachean Ethics make me want to drown myself in a bathtub filled with strawberry Yoplait Ultra yogurt while rabid chinchillas knaw on my exposed flesh.

[Dharkbayne]

Squeeky, Nicomachean Ethics make me want to drown myself in a bathtub filled with strawberry Yoplait Ultra yogurt while rabid chinchillas knaw on my exposed flesh.

pics:

[Doop]

I'M A NINJA

http://lautenbachillustrations.homestead.com/files/ninja.jpg

NINJAS ARE BETTER THAN OTHER THINGS

Discuss.

[Infernus]

I'M A NINJA

http://lautenbachillustrations.homestead.com/files/ninja.jpg

NINJAS ARE BETTER THAN OTHER THINGS

Discuss.

pood eid...

[Dharkbayne]

I'M A NINJA

[img]

NINJAS ARE BETTER THAN OTHER THINGS

Discuss.


NO YOU ARE NOT. YOU ARE *NOT* A NINJA. NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NTO NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT
A NINJA. NOR A PIRATE.
NOR AN ITALIAN MARINE WITH A MOUSTACHE.

[r3d]

ninjas are gay

Pirates for the win

[Doop]

NO YOU ARE NOT. YOU ARE *NOT* A NINJA. NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NTO NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT
A NINJA. NOR A PIRATE.
NOR AN ITALIAN MARINE WITH A MOUSTACHE.

Dhark, you are homosexual plzkthx.

[Mag]

You're asking him to be homosexual?

[Infernus]

You're asking him to be homosexual?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


OMG OMG OMG... Dhark? Gay? it's like a dream come true!

[Doop]

I'm still a Ninja.
You're supposed to be discussing this.

[Mag]

Nuh-uh, you're Mega-Man, your avatar says so.

[Doop]

Megaman X, to you.
A Megaman X ninja.





























A very, very handsome, Megaman X ninja.

[Dharkbayne]

No.

[Mag]

Megaman X'd get his ass kicked by a ninja.
Reference this. www.realultimatepower.com

[Doop]

This calls for a flash demonstration.
One sec.

[Hezzy]

Megaman X, to you.
A Megaman X ninja.





























A very, very handsome, Megaman X ninja.


Who is also an Italian Marine with a moustache?

[Mag]

Doesn't matter to me, I'm blind.

[Infernus]

Who is also an Italian Marine with a moustache?

Doop has a worse split-personallity disorder then Tek... or is it Vitter?

[Mag]

Vittek

[Doop]

I'm not a motherfucking italian marine.
That's an urban legend.

http://smashschool.0catch.com/lalala.swf

[Hezzy]

Doesnt work

Owned

[Glaynor]

Wow - I don't think I have seen a thread with more random comments posted in it. Wait, my comment isn't random now - its about the other posts.

I like using Formula 409 to clean my house. It works much better than the chocolate syrup that I previously used.

There, now I feel better. I got that off my chest, whew.

[ViperGTS]

This new Logitech optical mouse is pretty good.

[Infernus]

This new Logitech optical mouse is pretty good.

They do make good mice dont they? Is the MX Duo?

[ViperGTS]

They do make good mice dont they? Is the MX Duo?
Nope. No idea what model it really is. My mom broke my mouse this morning and my cousin gave me one of his.
Edit: Hey fucker why arnt you in IRC?

[Triggar]

I use this:

http://img.epinions.com/images/opti/ff/3c/pr-Housewares-Method_Dish_Soap_Liquid_Aroma_Lavender.jpg

It smells pretty.

EDIT: It is dish soap.

[Squeeky]

I have succeded in totally and completely derailing this thread. Bravo!