PDA

View Full Version : [Philosophy]Aristotle or Plato?


JetRaiden
2004-09-24, 09:54 PM
Ive been reading "The Passion of the Western Mind" for Philosophy class, and Ive been wondering which ideology you guys lean towards. Youll have to base it off youre own knowledge, but heres a very simple example of Aristotle's and Plato's views:

Plato: Believed in an "Other Worldly" perspective. Meaning we are all originally in a higher world, but are born on Earth, and dont know what Truth Justice etc really are. We only see shadows of what's true/real.

Aristotle: Believed in a much more practical sense of reality. Everything has a purpose, and there is a reason for why everyone and everything is here.

Triggar
2004-09-24, 10:00 PM
I studied Aristotle first, so my views towards him are biased because I hated the course at first. But you have to appreciate what he thought - he did afterall teach Plato and plant the seeds of Plato's methodology.

Aristotle's vision for the perfect society is a really interesting concept to think about. If you read Ayn Rand, she bases a lot of her work off Aristotle's concepts.

However, I think Plato had a better idea of what the fuck reality was - Aristotle made me want to kill myself sometimes when I was reading his ramblings. But, meh.

JetRaiden
2004-09-24, 10:02 PM
I studied Aristotle first, so my views towards him are biased because I hated the course at first. But you have to appreciate what he thought - he did afterall teach Plato and plant the seeds of Plato's methodology.

Aristotle's vision for the perfect society is a really interesting concept to think about. If you read Ayn Rand, she bases a lot of her work off Aristotle's concepts.

However, I think Plato had a better idea of what the fuck reality was - Aristotle made me want to kill myself sometimes when I was reading his ramblings. But, meh.

actually I think Aristotle was a student of Plato, not vice versa. I just read like 50 pages of that book, very hard to follow sometimes. :ugh:

lil sampling:

"Aristotle's logic could be represented in the following way: (a) All motion is the result of the dynamism impelling potentiality to formal realization. (b) Since the universe as a whole is involved in motion, and since nothing moves without impulse toward form, the universe must be moved by a surpreme, universal form. (c) Since the highest form must already be perfectly realized- i.e., not in a potential state- and since matter is by definition the state of potientiality, the highest form is both entirely immaterial and without motion: hence the Unmoved Mover, the surpreme perfect Being that is in pure form, God."

I feel like I need to smoke a hickory pipe and stroke my chin as I read this.

Infernus
2004-09-24, 10:03 PM
Plato... I had to read "The Republic" for school once... the man is very realistic as opposed to most other Greek philosophers... He saw society for what it was, and the same things still apply for the most part today, but I digress for the sake of saving us from debate over politics and the current state of the social system.


Plato was a student of Socrates, Plato witnessed Socrates being put to death by the government of Athens... it was what compelled him to write "The Republic".

Triggar
2004-09-24, 10:03 PM
Ah, I'm getting old.

I mistook Aristotle for Socrates!

ViperGTS
2004-09-24, 10:20 PM
/me runs from this thread

OfaLoaf
2004-09-24, 10:26 PM
Wasn't Socrates the Greek philosopher who doubted everything?

Jekz
2004-09-24, 10:27 PM
Doubtful.

:|

Me not know.

Triggar
2004-09-24, 10:28 PM
Socrates didn't doubt everything, he questioned everything.

Annoyed the shit out of the local politicians, who never had answers.

JetRaiden
2004-09-24, 10:28 PM
Wasn't Socrates the Greek philosopher who doubted everything?
well he questioned everything. it was a little different. Im not studying socrates right now, so Im not really sure. :p I know that he questioned the unquestionable (at the time anyway) like system of government and society. it eventually got him killed. :rolleyes:

Sputty
2004-09-24, 11:30 PM
Aristotle and Plato are overrated
Alot of what they wrote was during a time where people believed everything was made of fire, water and earth, and they often used those things.

That being said, Plato has a better idea IMO, but I feel he gets a little too spiritual

But then again, I'm an existentialist, so I believe everyone chooses their own actions and should take responsibility for those actions.

Mag
2004-09-24, 11:42 PM
Socrates didn't doubt everything, he questioned everything.

Annoyed the shit out of the local politicians, who never had answers.

Amazing how things don't change eh?

Bighoss
2004-09-24, 11:43 PM
Amazing how things don't change eh?

was thinking the same

Zodiac
2004-09-24, 11:43 PM
Believe it or not I used to spend hours and hours comptemplating existance and philosophy. I gave it up, purged it from my mind, (was driving me mad) and decided to take things at face value, to try and enjoy all aspects of life for what they are without wondering why or how things came to be. I imagine my life will be too short to worry about deep thinking.

Pilgrim
2004-09-25, 01:08 AM
I voted other

Gotta stick with my Cioran.

He's a Nietchze Student but a bit more hopeful.

If you are inclined go get "The Trouble With Being Born" One of the most compelling philosiphy bbooks I've ever read (It actually sits on my desk at work so I can flip it open when the itch hits to look smarter then I am)

Infernus
2004-09-25, 01:09 AM
Socrates didn't doubt everything, he questioned everything.

Annoyed the shit out of the local politicians, who never had answers.

Their solution... Hemlock... which leads us to Plato!

UncleDynamite
2004-09-25, 06:18 AM
I prefer Aristotle only because of his emphasis on the importance of friendship, something that is nice to see in a philosophy. However, Plato comes a close second, mainly because Plato's works are actually very enjoyable reading, while Aristotle is dry and clumsy (no fault on his part, really. All of the Aristotle's writings are actually the compiled notes of his students, not from Aristotle's own pen). Plus, I think Plato makes some great points in The Republic, such as the virtues of a city.

ObnoxiousFrog
2004-09-25, 10:33 AM
Dadaism.

Basically, all people are alike, and we are all alike because we are all fucking retarded.

Jekz
2004-09-25, 11:45 AM
That's deep, Ob. ;)

Everay
2004-09-25, 12:56 PM
im gonna say artistotle, but truth be told i dont know shit about fuck, so im gonna go get three books sometime this week, the three subjects we were talking about just now will be those books focus.

SDM
2004-09-25, 01:07 PM
Confucius > Plato, Aristotle

Hezzy
2004-09-25, 01:10 PM
I'm stupid, I don't know anything about philosophy.

Not by choice though. The english educational system doesn't teach it. I'd rather have philosophy than something like "'OW TA MAEK TINGS OWT OV WOOD! HUR HUR" classes.

SDM
2004-09-25, 01:14 PM
Logic and Philosophy should both be mandatory IMO. Neither are even available in k-12 as far as I know.

Everay
2004-09-25, 02:12 PM
confectus, the idea of treating everyone well including your servents, right? i like that one over the other two, chinese religions that is.

ObnoxiousFrog
2004-09-25, 02:36 PM
tristan tzara's manifesto
by tristan tzara
19th february 1920

Have a good look at me!
I'm an idiot, I'm a practical joker, I'm a hoaxer.
Have a good look at me!
I'm ugly, my face has no expression, I'm small.
I'm like the rest of you!1
But ask yourselves, before you look at me, whether the iris by which you dispatch arrows of liquid sentiments isn't in fact fly-shit, if you belly's eyes are not sections of tumours who looks will at one moment emerge from some part of your body in the form of a blennorrhagic discharge.
You see with your navels - why do you hid from your navels the ridiculous spectacle we offer them? And lower down, women's genitals, love, pure love, naturally - rare steaks and oil painting. Everybody who looks and who understands can easily be classified somewhere between poetry and love, between steak and painting. They'll be digested, they'll be digested. I was recently accused of the theft of some furs. Probably because people thought I should still be classified as a poet. One of those poets who satisfy their legitimate need of cold onania in hot furs. H a H u, I know other, equally platonic, pleasures. Ring up your family on the telephone



and piss down the hole designed for musical, gastronomic and sacred nonsense.

DADA suggests 2 solutions:

NO MORE LOOKS!
NO MORE WORDS!2

Stop looking!
Stop talking!

For I, chameleon alteration infiltration with convenient attitudes - multicoloured opinions for every occasion size and price - I do the opposite of what I recommend to other people.3

I've forgotten something:

where ? why ? how ?
in other words:
the ventilator of cold examples will serve the fragile snake of the procession and I have never had the pleasure of seeing you, my dear, the ear will take itself out of the envelope rigid like all marine equipment and the products of Aa & Co's firm, chewing-gum for example and dogs have blue eyes, I drink chamomile tea, they drink the wind, DADA introduces new points of view, people site down now at the corners of tables, in attitudes which lean a bit to the left and to the right, that's why I've quarrelled with Dada, insist everywhere on the suppression of the Ds, eat Aa, brush yourself with Aa toothpaste, buy your clothes at Aa's. Aa is a handkerchief and genitals blowing their noses rapid collapse - made of rubber - noiseless, needs neither manifestos nor address books, it gives a 25% discount buy your clothes at Aa's he has blue eyes.

1 I wanted to give myself a bit of publicity.
2 No more manifestos.
3 Sometimes.

Badass.

Mag
2004-09-25, 03:02 PM
1920's Emo.

JetRaiden
2004-09-25, 11:50 PM
Confucius > Plato, Aristotle

eh, Im not familiar with Asian philosophy, I just chose Plato and Aristotle because their views contradict eachother.

Baneblade
2004-09-26, 02:39 PM
Rick James bitch.

JetRaiden
2004-09-26, 03:30 PM
Rick James bitch.

:doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: