PS3 a myth?

[Hamma]

Interesting story:
We're still digging through gigs of CES photographs when we happened upon one rather juicy bit we thought we might share. We found this little number over at the Blu-ray booth -- which, given the circumstances, we can only assume was paid for and set up at least in large part by Sony. Yes, you're reading that placard right (we had to zoom in from another angle since the lighting made it hard to catch a decent shot). Is it true? Is the Sony PlayStation 3 that we've all now come to know and love (or not) merely a "conceptual design?" Because if it is they must be further behind than we originally anticipated.
That would suck :ugh: Not only for the consumer but for PS3 they'd be miles behind Microsoft by the time it came out.

[OneManArmy]

sony sucks. at games, at consoles, at life.

[BUGGER]

More cahces for Halo3 to launch on the same date as the PS3...

...still not likely

[Biohazzard56]

I doubt they will have anything playable at E3, they havent even sent Beta kits to developers. Sony needs to just work on the cell processor, forget blu-ray, try to save face and come out with a powerful console. It seems as though they are light years behind Microsoft.

Im sure they have an internal working machine, but its just not fesable. Neither is this George Foreman of a box, or boomerang controller. The console shows incredable promise, but Sony is dropping the ball on this one.

____________

Also, I believe it was Steve Ballmer who said the whole Halo 3 bit. Whoever it was backed off of that statement in last month's issue of Game Informer.