View Full Version : Theory: How Resources Are Distributed Based on GDC Footage
The other night I decided to rewatch the game play footage from the GDC last month just to pass some time. Upon watching it, I noticed something peculiar during the fourth part of the video and i'm not sure if this has been brought up before.
http://www.planetside-universe.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=435&d=1334986241
At the 0:41 mark you ACTUALLY see Higby gain resources just before he closes the map.
Based on this small gain of resources and the two resources that were toggled on the map, I began a ratcheted attempt to plug in some numbers followed by a haphazard use of MS-Paint. Here is the result of how I believe the resources are laid out across Indar and how often you receive resources in this build of the Planetside 2 Alpha.
Glorious MS-Paint Indar Map (http://www.planetside-universe.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=436&d=1334986241)
A few things to keep in mind before I explain the math behind this map.
-Right now, we have no idea which specific resources are needed by what factions to buy Tanks, aircraft, power items ect... or how many resources are needed to buy these things so assume that these number values are arbitrary.
-This is an Alpha build! nothing is set in stone and will most likely change (it's most likely it has already changed since the GDC). The point of this map is to try to get a better understanding of what the developers are thinking when it comes to the resource system.
-I could be absolutely wrong and have no idea what i'm talking about!
With these things in mind i'l attempt to explain my thinking.
Each territory on the map (except the warp-gates) has a designated resource with two resource values; The Hourly Yield and the "Resource Tick". Every five minutes you personally receive resources based on the Resource Tick Value of each territory your empire controls on the continent you are fighting on. You see this tick happen in the GDC video. The Hourly Yield is how many resources you would receive assuming you maintain control of that territory for an hour.
Lets break down the resource tick seen in the GDC footage by referring to each resource by its colored icon.
Higby's character before the resource tick has the following resources stored up.
269 Blue
2667 Green
2670 Red
4984 Yellow
At the 0:41 mark in the video the resource tick takes place and resources are awarded to Higby based on the territories the New Conglomerate control on Indar.
the resource tick provides...
3 Blue from the 3 facilities the NC control (each facility has a resource tick of 1 (3x1=3) )
30 green* from the 11 territories the NC control that have green as its resource (i know 11x3 does not equal 30, the resource tick is more likely to be around 2.75 but i rounded it up because i doubt they want you to have a fraction of a resource. )
30 Red from the 6 territories the NC control that have red as its resource (Each red has a resource tick of 5 (6x5=30) )
56 Yellow from the 8 territories the NC control that have yellow as its resource (Each Yellow has a resource tick of 7 (7x8 =56) )
After the resource tick, Higby now has
272 Blue (269+3)
2697 Green (2667+30)
2700 Red (2670+30)
5040 Yellow (4984 +56)
However...
There are some problems with my theory that i'l point out.
-Some of this is fuzzy math and some of the resource ticks conflict with the hourly yield totals as shown in the resources tab on the map. For example the red resource's hourly yield total on the resource tab says its 350 yet the NC only control 6 red yielding territories. to make this more confusing i didnt speculate this number since that particular resource is toggled on and is shown on the regular map without all the MS-Paint.
Green is slightly off from my numbers but it is close to whats actually being displayed. My numbers would put the hourly total for green at 363 compared to the 360 that's being shown.
Blue and Yellow the math checks out.
I think i'm just going to shut up here and see what you guys think.
Bluecewe
2012-04-20, 06:23 AM
I'm not really sure whether that sort of "automatic" distribution would be practical.
I would at least expect there to be some sort of barrier to being given resources without actually doing anything. I would hope that a player would need to get involved with a mission and then be rewarded a fair distribution.
Also, I'm aware of the whole faction system, however it might be possible for Outfits to "operate" territory, meaning they control the distribution of resources through handing out missions to players in the area and passing it down through their own organization.
PlaceboCyanide
2012-04-20, 08:32 AM
( I got an invalid link message, fyi )
It would be awesome if we could get more info on this game mechanic, because just about everything will be a shot in the dark. That being said... Judging from some of the numbers on the map, they might still be working out this system. Each "cluster" of hexes gave the exact same amount as well regardless of how many hexes that territory was comprised of. At face value it appears 5 hex territories and 2 hex territories are equal value from that map.
60 Red
84 Yellow
I would at least expect there to be some sort of barrier to being given resources without actually doing anything. I would hope that a player would need to get involved with a mission and then be rewarded a fair distribution.
I hear what you're saying but just because a person isn't in the thick of it doesn't mean they aren't helping the war effort:
- Engineers staying behind to repair bases and/or vehicles.
- Pilots guarding their deployed galaxy and avoiding direct fight enabling teammates to spawn
- Cloaker avoiding combat in order to relay intel.
Assuming that the resource gain offline and online are not identical I do think some effort should be spent to prevent people from resource sponging and just going afk in a base. Auto-logout after 5-10 minutes of inactivity or something of the sort.
I'm not really sure whether that sort of "automatic" distribution would be practical.
I would at least expect there to be some sort of barrier to being given resources without actually doing anything. I would hope that a player would need to get involved with a mission and then be rewarded a fair distribution.
Also, I'm aware of the whole faction system, however it might be possible for Outfits to "operate" territory, meaning they control the distribution of resources through handing out missions to players in the area and passing it down through their own organization.
At that point you're getting close to the idea of a resource economy, and I'm not sure the devs have thought out the idea well enough for that. In a game like EVE economy elements are central to the game for everyone. In PS2 resources (and keeping a constant source of them) is going to be the "carrot" to get everyone to fight, not the currency you loot.
So I can see bonus resource for completing missions maybe, or being the ones to actually take capture points. Though I think the devs want to make sure players (if their empire is successful) at least have enough resources to pull equipment/vehicles which are central to playing the game. If you're a mossie pilot who runs out of personal resources you shouldn't have to grind it out on foot trying to find a conquerable resource tile to try and take so you can get up in the sky again, imo.
Xyntech
2012-04-20, 09:12 AM
Resources could be dolled out by some simple criteria.
One criteria would be how much of the resource your empire controls.
The other criteria could be a requirement that you do something useful for your empire.
Maybe you get a tiny amount every now and then for doing nothing (hopefully not), but any time you heal someone, someone uses a deployable you placed, you kill someone, etc, you get a more significant amount of the resource.
The more of the resource you controlled, the more you would get. The better you did for your empire, the more you would get.
Having things like tracking to see how recently someone got hurt by enemy fire would be important to tell how valuable a medic was being. Whether they were actually doing their job in a battle (should be worth tons of resources), or whether they are just healing somebody who keeps taking team damage in the middle of friendly territory just so you can earn easy resources.
Xyntech
2012-04-20, 09:13 AM
If you're a mossie pilot who runs out of personal resources you shouldn't have to grind it out on foot trying to find a conquerable resource tile to try and take so you can get up in the sky again, imo.
Time to pull out an ATV :D
Edit, sorry, didn't mean to double post. It's early and I haven't had my coffee
Vamp Hunter
2012-04-20, 10:09 AM
Very interesting work, based on your estimates of the ticks that means one resource gives you 1 every tick, one gives you 3, another gives you 5, and the last one gives you 7.
I think that's interesting because it means they are all odd numbers and they are each the next odd number up from the last.
It also confirms what the devs have said in the past, some resources are rarer then others.
Resources could be dolled out by some simple criteria.
One criteria would be how much of the resource your empire controls.
The other criteria could be a requirement that you do something useful for your empire.
I like the idea for sure, but while the game will definitely track lots of stats that could be analyzed; I'd bet it would be a huge endeavor to get the game to award resources on the fly based on those stats.. Damage done to an enemy = XP is one thing, but damage + support + "just being there" = resources / # of players present, would get to be a lot of number crunching ongoing, all the time. That and what happens if parts of my contribution to the battle take place slightly outside whatever is considered the boundaries of the battle for that resource.
I like the idea, I just imagine taking it from a simple incentive to fight, to a full blown (most likely constant balance requiring) crucial game mechanic is a lot more work than we may realize it is.. :p
Malorn
2012-04-20, 01:26 PM
One of the questions Higby answered about resources indicated that there are different yields for resources. So the reason you see differences in the number of territories and the amount is that some territories are worth more than others.
The blue resources was the currency with the "planetside logo" on it and I was wondering how that got accumulated since I saw no territories with it. That also appeared to be the currency in the shop, so that one accumulates much more slowly and makes sense becuase it may not be used for normal everyday stuff. The other three represent Infantry, Ground vehicles, and Air vehicles I believe, but it is different for each empire exactly what type a given resource is used for.
Resources were also described as a dividend of owned territories and indicated that it changes based on population. So high population might have fewer resources to go around. Not sure if the population indicator is absolute population or relative population. I think relative makes more sense and is easier to balance but its anyone's guess.
Soothsayer
2012-04-20, 04:43 PM
I like the idea for sure, but while the game will definitely track lots of stats that could be analyzed; I'd bet it would be a huge endeavor to get the game to award resources on the fly based on those stats.. Damage done to an enemy = XP is one thing, but damage + support + "just being there" = resources / # of players present, would get to be a lot of number crunching ongoing, all the time. That and what happens if parts of my contribution to the battle take place slightly outside whatever is considered the boundaries of the battle for that resource.
I like the idea, I just imagine taking it from a simple incentive to fight, to a full blown (most likely constant balance requiring) crucial game mechanic is a lot more work than we may realize it is.. :p
This would be a good way to integrate the mission system as an additional way to get people who participate properly rewarded.
I think that there could also be value in class-specific missions that are personal in nature, also this could be automatically generated by the mission system based on the stat tracking.
If there is a lack of medics noticed by the mission system by way of an empire having a less than optimal amount of healing, the system could incentivize [spellcheck says that word doesn't exist] playing that class to make up for an empire's moment-to-moment lack of that playstyle.
The mission system is a dynamic system and as a result it could be used to shore up deficiencies based on the needs of an empire at any given time by rewarding under represented playstyles.
Retrograde
2012-04-24, 09:28 PM
Great analysis, AWP. Thanks for doing the math.
These resource types might represent different scale items you can pull:
Level 1 - Game points (for upgrades)
Level 2 - Light vehicles, light aircraft, MAX suits
Level 3 - Heavy vehicles, heavy aircraft, MBT, etc...
Level 4 - Sunderer, Liberator & Galaxy
Based on the scale at which those resources are earned, capping bases provides "permanent" upgrades, that entice everyone. That would explain the 'planetside' logo on them.
If you were low in one area, you could look at the map and see where those 'points' came from and go cap that specific type of resource.
These probably don't correspond with how quickly the resources amass, but it's also impossible to speculate which is which due to the cost of the item being the major factor. If something is cheap and the resource is plentiful, there might still be a spawn timer on it.
These could also be resources for my empire, not my personal resources. In that case, there is no dis-incentive to using the most expensive resources. Or it could limit my style of play in that the empire has no aircraft points available.
Higby
2012-04-24, 09:57 PM
I love you guys.
Zenben
2012-04-24, 10:02 PM
I love you guys.
We love you too! :love: When's beta?
Mechzz
2012-04-24, 10:02 PM
I love you guys.
we love you too
Red Beard
2012-04-24, 10:05 PM
I love you guys.
Higby is obviously at a loss for words over how his next game play PR video was just rendered obsolete! :lol:
Toppopia
2012-04-24, 10:13 PM
I love you guys.
He would only be saying this because either he has seen my contributions to the forums and thought i am so awesome and decided to share the love.
Or he knows something big is about to happen and can't contain his excitement.
Hopefully its the latter :D
Carbanu
2012-04-24, 11:21 PM
By your calculations and at that fixed rate, it would take over a thousand hours to accumulate 40,000 Auraxium. I used 40K because that is the largest sum I remember from the GDC footage. ~40 days of consecutive play? Is anyone really willing to wait that long for a side-grade?
Kind of forces players to buy Station Cash. This might not sit well with the CoD/BF fanboys they have tried so hard to "please" with all the changes to Planetside from the original.
I have said before, what we can earn and buy should not be light years apart from each other.
Why do you all put so much effort into speculating how things are going to work when there's an enormous possibility that it's going to change a ton before and during beta?
Zenben
2012-04-25, 12:46 AM
Why do you all put so much effort into speculating how things are going to work when there's an enormous possibility that it's going to change a ton before and during beta?
Because there's nothing better to do until beta? Well, D3 should help with that, but on the off-chance beta starts before D3 is released, my head may explode.
NivexQ
2012-04-25, 12:48 AM
Why do you all put so much effort into speculating how things are going to work when there's an enormous possibility that it's going to change a ton before and during beta?
Some people find it fun. It's not like you have to do it.
Eyeklops
2012-04-25, 01:18 AM
This thread makes me feel odd. It's kinda like somebody touched PS2 in an inappropriate manner in an inappropriate place and I accidentally saw it.
basti
2012-04-25, 06:36 AM
He would only be saying this because either he has seen my contributions to the forums and thought i am so awesome and decided to share the love.
Or he knows something big is about to happen and can't contain his excitement.
Hopefully its the latter :D
Appears to be the latter. :P
Flisher
2012-04-25, 09:15 AM
The difference between the 360/363 could be a faction population normalization?
Eyeklops
2012-04-25, 09:28 AM
The difference between the 360/363 could be a faction population normalization?
I would say more like obsessive speculation.
Ailos
2012-04-25, 09:52 AM
We love you too! :love: When's beta?
When we've analyzed every frame of the GDC footage in this manner.
Malorn
2012-04-25, 10:00 AM
The difference between the 360/363 could be a faction population normalization?
I believe that to be the case. The resources collected by the empire and the resources given to Higby were different and Higby's were always smaller, and that's consistent with his statement that resources are a dividend awarded to players over time.
He also said there are resource rewards for attacking and defending territories, but we don't know how much of a reward difference it is from the normal payouts.
I love you guys.
I'm not sure if I should be flattered or ashamed. Maybe a bit of both.
By your calculations and at that fixed rate, it would take over a thousand hours to accumulate 40,000 Auraxium. I used 40K because that is the largest sum I remember from the GDC footage. ~40 days of consecutive play? Is anyone really willing to wait that long for a side-grade?
Kind of forces players to buy Station Cash. This might not sit well with the CoD/BF fanboys they have tried so hard to "please" with all the changes to Planetside from the original.
I have said before, what we can earn and buy should not be light years apart from each other.
I really wouldn't worry about the numbers in the shop or the numbers on the presented on the map as being final. It was mentioned in the video that the shop was there just a mock-up. I highly doubt they would want players to acquire a single gun for every 40 days of consecutive of game play. That's about the equivalent of leveling a WoW character 1-85 and getting a fair amount of raid gear.
It is interesting to point out that the resources that the facilities produce are the same resources needed in the in-game shop. While this could change, it may give us insight on what they are thinking about the resource system.
Why do you all put so much effort into speculating how things are going to work when there's an enormous possibility that it's going to change a ton before and during beta?
I find it fun! I like game design. Assuming my theory is correct, its going to be interesting to see how the resource system changes from this build to the next. For me, its about seeing what changes where made, what stayed the same and trying to figure out why they made changes.
This thread makes me feel odd. It's kinda like somebody touched PS2 in an inappropriate manner in an inappropriate place and I accidentally saw it.
:lol: I can see that. I'd like to think i'm that guy who spots a moving blur in the background of someones home movie and is absolutely convinced that it's big-foot.
Speaking of big-foot. I have a theory that there are yetis on Esamir. I just need an obscure second of game play footage of Esamir to build my case up.
Suiciderunner
2012-04-25, 09:06 PM
And we love you too!
Saifoda
2012-06-12, 11:19 AM
This thread makes me feel odd. It's kinda like somebody touched PS2 in an inappropriate manner in an inappropriate place and I accidentally saw it.
uhlawl.
That is all.
+1 karma for you.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.