This game even optimize yet ? (PS2) [Archive]

View Full Version : This game even optimize yet ? (PS2)

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:11 PM

I played very little into the beta cause I was not impressed where they were taking PS2. I understand it is good to have different stuff added to the game but alot was change. Now since it has been release recently, I just got into a game, had my settings on medium and was only hitting 15fps max in battle? What crap is this?!?!?! I run a i7-950 with 2 GTX 580 GPU in SLI, 6 gigs of ram and I am suppose to deal with 15fps in battle ? Or is the game just litterally broken or still in a "beta phase." This was only on medium settings. Anyone else having the same issue or similar problem ?

Meecrob

2012-11-25, 01:34 PM

Not sure if troll or serious, but with your hardware you should easily run it on high and have 40 fps in big battles and 60+ all other times.

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:37 PM

Not sure if troll or serious, but with your hardware you should easily run it on high and have 40 fps in big battles and 60+ all other times.

Far from trollin. I check my end to see if my GPU running is SLI mode and it is. Something is wrong here and I do not have a clue what else it could be. My fps get hit hard when into battle but I should not be hitting 15fps max with this hardware.

Sporkar

2012-11-25, 01:44 PM

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:48 PM

I've got a core2quad, 560ti and 4 gigs of ram. I have everything on high.
On the other hand, my friend has an i7, 8 gigs of ram and a better graphics card (not sure what). He runs everything on low and still gets a ton of lag. I think it's something to do with the i7.

This is a start right here. I get that lag as well and the game is very unplayable. Atleast I know Iam not the only one experiencing this issue.

Meecrob

2012-11-25, 01:50 PM

Which server are you on? EU servers are having some troubles during prime time.... (please SOE or prosieben fix it allready)

Jaybonaut

2012-11-25, 01:50 PM

Oh, good question - no one else has brought this topic up at all several times the last few weeks...

http://i.imgur.com/1KZj2.png

Stick Pin

2012-11-25, 01:53 PM

Not sure if troll or serious, but with your hardware you should easily run it on high and have 40 fps in big battles and 60+ all other times.

And what is your rig? I'd like to know what ppl have that have high fps. I get 60 at the warpgate and -20 in a big battle too. I shouldn't have to overclock my i7,....should I?

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:56 PM

Which server are you on? EU servers are having some troubles during prime time.... (please SOE or prosieben fix it allready)

Iam in central USA..I usually play east servers.

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:58 PM

And what is your rig? I'd like to know what ppl have that have high fps. I get 60 at the warpgate and -20 in a big battle too. I shouldn't have to overclock my i7,....should I?

You have the same exact specs what I have except I have a GTX 580 sli and only 6 gigs of ram. I experience 40-60 fps not in battle but in battle same as you 15-20 fps.

dotcom

2012-11-25, 01:59 PM

Oh, good question - no one else has brought this topic up at all several times the last few weeks...

http://i.imgur.com/1KZj2.png

Well obviously this is a on going issue that has not been fix yet...

Meecrob

2012-11-25, 01:59 PM

Well i have a Intel 2 Core quad Q6600 4 gb of ram and a Radeon HD 4870 And i get 15-20 fps in big battles and 40+ at other times, but i have a flatmate with a I7 and a Geforce 560 (or something) and he runs it on high with the before mentioned fps numbers.

Do remember to edit your render distance in your Useroptions.ini file. Even my flatmate with the better computer has it limited to 3000 meters. I am a bit disappointed the devs have not facilitated this in the ingame grapihc options, because it makes a world of difference.

Also if any mod reads this, you guys might wanna sticky a topic with this hint for all the new people since release who probably don't know this.

Kail

2012-11-25, 02:08 PM

dotcom

2012-11-25, 02:19 PM

i7-2600K, 8GB RAM, Radeon HD 6970.

I run everything High, except I turned down Shadows and Particles to medium. Ambient Occlusion on, motion blur and fog shadows off. I haven't looked closely, but the couple times I've checked it seems to hover between 30-40 FPS during fights - while it would be sweet to get it higher, that's high enough for me not to notice.

To me, there should be no reason why you should be hitting under 60 fps. The game has been in beta for along time and it is still not optimize to work correctly. It has been rushed...

Serpent

2012-11-25, 02:41 PM

There are a bunch of crashes for me, even though I get 50-60 FPS usually. It's pretty frustrating =/

Meecrob

2012-11-25, 02:57 PM

To me, there should be no reason why you should be hitting under 60 fps. The game has been in beta for along time and it is still not optimize to work correctly. It has been rushed...

Ok i get why people do not like low fps and ussualy equate this to graphics, but this is just not true.... and tbh everytime i hear someone say this i feel a little insulted on behalf of the devs.

You clearly have no idea what a technical achievement PS2 is and saying something like this is just ignorant.

dotcom

2012-11-25, 03:15 PM

Ok i get why people do not like low fps and ussualy equate this to graphics, but this is just not true.... and tbh everytime i hear someone say this i feel a little insulted on behalf of the devs.

You clearly have no idea what a technical achievement PS2 is and saying something like this is just ignorant.

Wait a min..how long were we in beta ? Other people with lower rigs then mine, playing on high and having no problems with fps ? Im sure the devs do there job try to make this game enjoyable for everyone to play. You would think after all the months in beta this would have been figure out. I wanted to give this game a second chance to see what has change from beta and better itself. Right now it is not heading that direction. To me, devs were more worried about what is in the game how it was being played. Should of put more time in optimzing how the game is goin to run on other rigs.

Didnt you stated this earlier to me?

"Not sure if troll or serious, but with your hardware you should easily run it on high and have 40 fps in big battles and 60+ all other times."

Meecrob

2012-11-25, 03:42 PM

Wait a min..how long were we in beta ? Other people with lower rigs then mine, playing on high and having no problems with fps ? Im sure the devs do there job try to make this game enjoyable for everyone to play. You would think after all the months in beta this would have been figure out. I wanted to give this game a second chance to see what has change from beta and better itself. Right now it is not heading that direction. To me, devs were more worried about what is in the game how it was being played. Should of put more time in optimzing how the game is goin to run on other rigs.

Didnt you stated this earlier to me?

"Not sure if troll or serious, but with your hardware you should easily run it on high and have 40 fps in big battles and 60+ all other times."

Well... ok sorry for being harsh, but if the game does not run well with your specs im pretty sure the problem is on your end, not the game's. I've stated my PC specs earlier and i manage to run the game, so if you try you will be fine.

My point in my previous post was that SOE, for all their faults (customer support, terrible expansions, etc), have one thing that makes them stand out of the MMO developer crowd. They clearly have the best understanding of what is needed to make numbers in a MMO work. This means that their networking code optimisation must be the best of any gaming company in existance. With all of their previous mmo's they have also shown that they're on the front of MMO development.

WoW stagnated MMO evolution, because every mmo company tried to copy them. I'm a giant fan of SOE for this aspect. It's hard to find any game developer who are willing to take risk with something new. SOE never held back because of this reason and allways strife to innovate.