PDA

View Full Version : Do PlanetSide's graphics suck? More importantly, do we care?


SpaceDrake
2003-04-07, 09:27 PM
Hey folks. I've heard some people in the past deriding PS's graphics as being rather simplistic. Looking at the screenshots, I sort of see their point: the textures seem to be slightly low-res, and a lot of character models don't seem too polygonally complex.

But I find myself not caring one bit. I am a member of the Olde Schoole - I remember when consoles displayed at roughly 256x256 and characters were limited to four colors. Anything 16 bit or higher looks beautiful to my eyes. I personally don't care if they use the Quake 1 engine for PS - the gameplay looks so incredibly good I'll play it regardless.

Anyone share a similar sentiment?

Condrah
2003-04-07, 09:41 PM
no

I actually think the graphics are really good for a mmorpgfpsrst...etc...

Tieom
2003-04-07, 09:41 PM
I think the graphics look shweet. Maybe I just don't have the 'critical eye' or something, but to me they look as good as anything else I've seen (Which admittedly aint much), but hell, they're better than tribes 2 by a long shot.

I cannot believe people are saying 'dood teh grafx suxorz'. PS isn't a MMOPGCBMP (Massively multiplayer online processor/graphics card benchmark program)! I mean, the graphics aren't orgasmic or anything, but maybe you've been taking too much eyecrack to appreciate eyecandy any more.

In summary: WTF n00b PS gfx r0x0rz j0r b0x0rz! It looks good to me, and if you want to complain, go ahead, I'll be sitting back and enjoying it.

Edit: 'It' meaning the graphics, not your complaining.

Civilian
2003-04-07, 09:49 PM
I'll reserve my opinion on the graphics until I am actually in game.

However, I believe you and I share a similar view. There are features in this game that brought me to the level of dedication I am currently at and it has absolutely nothing to do with graphics. The massive multiplayer aspect of the game is what I am most attracted too, but other portions of the game have made me the most excited I have been about a game since Tribes 1. I will say this, I played WWIIOL for over a year, the realism and the MMO world were what kept me around. It's painfully obvious how awful the graphics are/were on that game.

I think there is a good mix of good graphics and quality gameplay to attract fans that find both important. But personally, I think the graphics looks pretty nice considering what all went into programming this game.

Subliminal
2003-04-07, 09:59 PM
everyone seems to forget that screen shots:

A) never do a game justice, ever.

B)during the beta alot of the screens are on some lower settings

C)these are about as good as MMO gfx get

D) Most people with the judgement havent played the game and once they do they will shut up (just a guess) hopefully

Itlan
2003-04-07, 10:02 PM
No it is not Doom III, but for a MMO they are fantastic........to say they suck is just someone looking to flame for no reason.

TheGreatCarbini
2003-04-07, 10:04 PM
From the acreenshots it looks like the game will look great in motion, there are alot of games where you just can't tell. Asheron's Call 2 looks incredible in screenshots... but it's not the best when you actualy play it... hehe I never made it passed the first month.

Planetside looks nice, but simple, without things being TOO simple just to increase the smoothness of the game. it should be nice, and I can't wait to see it in motion without the fuzzyness of .mpg video.

Frozen-Monkey
2003-04-07, 10:04 PM
you got to admit that PS graphics are damn good and should not be taken for granit. I'd play it even iff the graphics suck
(god forbid)

Camping Carl
2003-04-07, 10:09 PM
It's irritating to me, cause the graphics seem as good if not better than most of the popular fps out there, whit the exception of ut2003. Why are they chosing to complain about planetside?

But worse, is when I see somebody say PS is "Tribes with a monthly fee", as tho somehow they missed the words Massively Multiplayer part.

But worst of all, is tribers who say the "Tribes with a monthly fee thing". They like tribes, so why would they hate a tribes-like game on a massive scale? Some of them don't want to pay the fee sure, but many of them just think the game will suck. :confused:

It just pisses me off a bit when I see this stuff. :(

Seer
2003-04-07, 10:15 PM
I wouldn't worry about the people claiming the graphics suck or the concept sucks. They probably can't get their parents to pay for a monthly account.

1024
2003-04-07, 10:23 PM
"the graphics suck" and "The graphics rock", are opinionated statments, and therefore cannot be said as a fact.

Thought you might need clarification :D

Sputty
2003-04-07, 10:32 PM
That was the point of this thread. To find out opinions

colinisinhere
2003-04-07, 11:00 PM
i agree with the posterdude, but i think the graphics are great!

1024
2003-04-07, 11:05 PM
...am i posterdude?

SpartonX
2003-04-07, 11:10 PM
Originally posted by Seer
I wouldn't worry about the people claiming the graphics suck or the concept sucks. They probably can't get their parents to pay for a monthly account.

Couldn't have said it better myself:p

Hamma
2003-04-07, 11:28 PM
Graphics Do not suck :|

Euroclydon
2003-04-07, 11:37 PM
I don't think PS's advances in gaming are graphics. People coming from FPS games such as UT2k3 might be a little disappointed with the graphics, but anyone coming from some type of MMOG will probably appreciate the graphics, knowing that gameplay is much more important.

Actually, the draw distance is pretty amazing in this game. Those are the kind of graphical features I like... ones that affect gameplay (being able to see the tower you need to get to way in the distance) as opposed to pure eyecandy.

Sarah Jinstar
2003-04-08, 12:26 AM
Considering not only is it an MMO, but one set to be an fps mainly at that. I personally think what I've seen so far of screenshots is Very Very impressive.

Granted no it isn't Doom3, but when you take the gameplay into account, hundreds of characters on screen at once, all duking it out in some fantastic firefight, you can't possibly have graphics on the side of doom3 and have it be playable.

That said, from what I've seen I still think the game looks spiffy, possibly even better than some games that Aren't! mmo's.

Just my 2 cents.

colinisinhere
2003-04-08, 12:49 AM
Originally posted by Spike
...am i posterdude?

did you post it? if not them you are just a dude... but if so, you are a posterdude. duh

Chief-BOA
2003-04-08, 02:14 AM
dont care if the graphics are bad. Operation flashpoint graphics were not that great but it was still a great game

MorphiasAC
2003-04-08, 03:24 AM
The gameplay is what counts to me. Frankly, if the graphics are decent and all of the command features, and teamwork features work out I will love this game. It is what I have really been looking forward to for a while. A team based game where you are not simply trying to outsmart the AI, but trying to outsmart the other players, which are almost always more creative than any AI. Come on, is anyone truly interested in this game simply because they expect it to be as someone so eloquently put it "eyecrack"?

SlapNut
2003-04-08, 04:03 AM
in my oppinion, its a MMOFPS, there anrnt many of them, so this is the opening for some to come, so for ammofps the graphics are great, there are 1000's of people trying to play at once, the only games where that happens are things like everquest where they cant use good graphics, so ps is heaps good. and i have to buy a new computer to run it, course its gonna be good.

Matuse
2003-04-08, 04:51 AM
Wasteland is still the best game ever made, and by today's standards, its graphics are El Shittastic. I don't care.

The lower quality the graphics, the lower the hardware requirements, and the easier it is to play with more people involved. Stick figures throwing rocks at each other is fine with me if the game is fun.

I find that people who tend to harp on graphical quality tend to have IQ's roughly equal to spoiled cabbage, and if you take a tinfoil gum wrapper and wave it in front of their eyes, they'll shut up for an hour. Sadly, many of these people are game developers who insist on putting in flashy eye candy ahead of such trivial things as stability, compatibility, story, and fun.

MorphiasAC
2003-04-08, 04:54 AM
:cheers: :wantbeta:

Hawklans
2003-04-08, 04:57 AM
The graphics dont suck, its beautiful - just enough pretty things to make the world seem real but not so much that it detracts from the action...

from playing the beta i would say they are as good as any online game out there that has the same level of action etc...

and no i dont care what they look like... after watching a massive battle for Itan yesterday i didnt give a damm about how it all looked, it was the game itself that got me immersed....

shodan
2003-04-08, 04:59 AM
Originally posted by Hamma
Graphics Do not suck :|

Hamma's in beta, his word is good enough for me that the graphics are tidy.

Metroid
2003-04-08, 06:04 AM
The fact is, the graphics rock.
Why is it fact? Cuz I'll keelhaul your arse if you disagree! MWAHAHAHAH
^_^

Sarah Jinstar
2003-04-08, 06:40 AM
Like I said. For an MMO, especially one trying to pull off what PS is the graphics are pretty damn good looking if you ask me.

Considering Hamma is in the beta I'll have to take his word for it. Plus pretty much most of the ss's look pretty damn good if ya ask lil ol me.

*sigh* has it been 2 weeks yet? :wantbeta:

MiniOrca
2003-04-08, 07:28 AM
gotta remeber that you could be looking at low res graphics. You can set the res on this game higher or lower. Iv seen high res screenshots and they look very cool

Zatrais
2003-04-08, 08:21 AM
Look at the recent shots thats hamma's taken whit the 9700 pro...

They look pretty damn sweet to me.

roWmz
2003-04-08, 08:55 AM
http://www.planetside-universe.com/media/viewer.php?img_id=847

just look at that pic, and tell me whether or not the graphics suck :)

yinghung
2003-04-08, 09:39 AM
Its not about the graphics that really matter.. its about the gameplay.. the games gona be great! and then i can kiss everquest goodbye :D

Happy lil Elf
2003-04-08, 10:58 AM
Wasteland is still the best game ever made, and by today's standards, its graphics are El Shittastic. I don't care.

Amen brother. Wasteland is up there with Syndicate :)

Airlift
2003-04-08, 11:03 AM
No, they don't suck, yes it would matter to me (though not more than if the gameplay sucked)

LesserShade
2003-04-08, 12:02 PM
I think the graphics are very nice. One thing for sure though is the character models and character animations are the best I've seen in a FPS IMO.

Hamma
2003-04-08, 12:17 PM
Originally posted by Happy lil' Elf
Amen brother. Wasteland is up there with Syndicate :) Syndicate owned.

Prefect
2003-04-08, 03:54 PM
My friends in the beta are of the opinion that PS's graphics are better than BF1942.

SpacemanSpiff
2003-04-08, 04:06 PM
LOL... I busted out my Syndicate copy a few days ago. Miniguns all the way! :D

orogogus
2003-04-08, 04:33 PM
I kind preferred gauss rifles/ flamethrowers because it was funny to watch people burn and run around....

crap, I wonder where the heck I can get a copy of that to see if I could run it again...

and the end of the game where the enemy syndicate duded would come at you but they all had the self destruct bombs, and when you minigunned them there would just be these collossal chain-reactor explosions... heh. Yeah, that was a good game. I remember the expansion being totally impossible though.

Wasteland did and does rock though. I still have characters that I play through the game like 30 times with that are so buff that can pretty much go through the game nekkid and kill everything with their hands if they wanted too. :D

Oberon
2003-04-08, 04:33 PM
To say that the graphics in PS are shit is rediculous. They may not make your eyes bleed like Unreal 2, but they certainly dont suck. The game looks amazing in the videos.

Also, GRAPHICS DO NOT MAKE THE GAME!... DOA:XBV is proof....the graphics were good enough to give us....certain feelings :rolleyes: :thumbsup: :drools: ...but the gameplay was utter crap. Tetris was just a bunch of blocks, but its a classic!

Planetside is revolutionary. It rocks. Th' End.

colinisinhere
2003-04-08, 09:44 PM
personaly i think Half-Life had good graphics...

Sarah Jinstar
2003-04-09, 02:44 AM
And to further note, Unreal's graphics only look as good as they do since every damn thing is pixel shaded beyond belief. oooh shiny! give me a break!

From what I've seen so far movie footage (downloaded the huge gamespy movie and the other trailer) and of the screenies. I still think PS holds quite a bright torch to most of the fps'es out there, mmo or not.

And this is coming from someone who isn't really into fps. I'm more of a rpg'er which is what attracted me to PS in the first place. The ability to level up my character and make a difference for my empire. Quite the twist on the usual slaying dragons & such that I'm used to.

ok I'll stop rambling now :cool: