Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PSU: Better than a mosquito in your MAX suit!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #1 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
As a supporter of the FairTax and one who detests the current system, I can honestly say that... This is the worst tax idea I have ever seen. Lets start from the top, shall we? 9% "business tax" The current Federal corporate tax rate goes from 15% to 35%. It is calculated much the same way as individual income tax, though deductions reduce taxable income both with the current and proposed system. It's a straight tax decrease, which I'm not inherently opposed to. Though since the proposed 999 plan intends to generate as much revenue as the current system, it has to make up for this in other ways... unpleasant ways. 9% income tax Many Americans pay no income tax now, and their employer pays a 7.65% payroll tax out of their wages. Even if the employer passes all of that savings on to the employee (though it's more likely to be passed to customers to increase competitiveness) that would already be a tax increase. In fact, this data from taxfoundation.org indicates that approximately the bottom 80% of American earners had a tax burden of 9% or less once tax rebates and credits were included (it's in the first table on the page). That means a 9% income tax will be an increase for the VAST majority of Americans and a MASSIVE decrease for the highest earners, who currently have an effective tax rate of 23% or more. 9% sales tax Saving the best for last, I suppose. Lets ignore for a moment the horror of trying to impose a 9% sales tax on all new goods and services throughout the country (and the internet). As anyone who's thought about taxes for more than 5 minutes knows, straight sales taxes are regressive. If you have to spend your entire paycheck to live under a roof and eat, you pay the highest tax rate. If you make a boatload of money beyond that, you can save it or invest it to increase your wealth. This part of the 9-9-9 proposal makes it not simply fair for everyone, but actually has the poor pay the highest tax rate, while the wealthy pay the lowest tax rate. This tax plan is like a pass/fail intelligence test for Americans. On the one side, it's disheartening to see so many people in favor of it. On the other, it's nice to know that Cain will not be elected if Obama can explain the plan with any measure of efficacy. Anyone here have thoughts on the 9-9-9 plan, Cain, or Obama's victory if Cain is the GOP nominee? |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #2 | ||
I think FairTax is retarded. I also think Herman Cain is a joke and this plan of his is retarded. 9-9-9 may have worked for pizza and maybe it made HIM rich, but will it make the country rich? Will it make average Americans rich?
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #3 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
Total agreement, much like most replublican stuff lately, its a way to help the rich and screw everyone else. Sad to see the party i had voted for long ago turn into either complete idiots or corporately owned evil asshats. Normally i laugh at things that sound conspiracy-ish like this, but now its out in the open they focus on corporations and the obscenely rich at the expense of everyone else.
Not sure what worries me more, the thought they are just helping themselves and the corporations who pay them (legally in complete secrecy now thanks to republicans) and screwin anyone who cant pay their way in, or the fact they might actually be so completely stupid as to believe their own crap they spin and that same person is actually in charge of some things in this country and we have to pay them as well. And on top of that, people vote for these guys, even the people who are really hurt the most by them, its insanity.
__________________
Waiting for the return of the superior, real PS style teamwork oriented vehicles with drivers not gunning, and in fixed vehicle slots so we can once again have real, epic, vehicle battles where the tanks actually move in combat rather than a silly 1700's era line up and shoot. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
But guys, it has a spiffy name, after all, just saying the word "Change" got Obama elected.
![]() But in all seriousness, all of the politicians in Washington need to be purged with holy fire, the amount of corruption and stupidity is ridiculous. We don't just need an overhaul of the tax system, we need an overhaul of the entire federal government.
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Captain
|
Herman Cain Stealing from SimCity 4
Also, on the bottom of the article, there is a video about Herman Cain using a song from Pokemon in his speech. He's a winner alright. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #10 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
You really need to think before you talk, I can only take so much stupidity at one time.
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Colonel
|
If I say "people should all be paid in pink balloons", then I laugh to think of what you would do. Attempt suicide? Smash your computer on the floor? Have a sex change?
Turn down the estrogen. Being able to send you into a foot-stamping frustrated little tizzy with one offhand statement is entertaining, I have to say. Impose a 1000% duty on all goods either made in China, shipped on a non-U.S. owned fleet or in a non-U.S.-owned container from Asia, and make the country of origin label be half of the entire front of the package, if it isn't made in the USA, kind of like they do with cancer warnings on cigarettes in some countries. Imagine, Wal-Mart having to sell plastic trinkets at only a 10,000 percent markup instead of 1,000,000 percent markup. Imagine, factories in America, you know, where there are product quality laws, such as not being able to put poison in milk, and no U-235-based paint on children's toys, actually producing stuff that lasted more than three uses before failing. Then, put a giant wall across the Southern border, manned by anyone in the USA who was an illegal alien, whose "community service" to gain citizenship is a year on the wall keeping others out. There. Problems solved. Want to address the trade imbalance? How about for every ten dollars spent on Chinese goods, China, has to spend one hundred on American-made goods? There. So simple. Last edited by Traak; 2011-10-15 at 11:56 PM. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Captain
|
thats just retarded,that would make almost every middle class family in the country have to pay 50%,what we need is a sales tax on everything that isn't considered food,utilities or healthcare related,that way the ppl that are spending the most as consumers would be paying the larger percentage of the taxes,if you buy that one hundred thousand dollar car then you should have to pay federal sales tax,this way the ppl with all the money get taxed for everything they buy and the poor would not have their taxes raised through the roof.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
[Ignore Me] #15 | ||
Colonel
|
I'm wary of the 'fair tax' since it seems its primary purpose is to ditch corporate taxes entirely. Corporations don't spend much money that is not a business expense. I concede that most corporate taxes are pretty much just passed on to the consumer, but I highly doubt they would just suddenly lower their prices. I find it considerably more likely they would keep their prices as is and let the consumer eat the additional tax. Having their cake and eating it too.
The fair tax seems interesting, but I would definitely love to see them run an experiment on it first. Perhaps in Alaska, where there is no easy state line to cross to buy from a state. Otherwise my first preference would be to simply end all subsidies, credits, loopholes, and settle on a lower income tax rate. I'm fine with a few tax credits, but there should be limits on how many they can legally mandate. |
||
![]() |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|