| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-01-18, 06:55 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #1 | |||
|
Contributor Brigadier General
|
This was an entry for that metagame contest, but I'm actually more curious as to what you guys have to say about it...
A quick in-depth to how I envision the mission system: A mission system is a Squad Leader tool allowing to place a certain marker on a certain dynamic object, adding a "condition" for all his squad members. But since PlanetSide 2 is all about teamwork I propose the following implementation based on my envisioning of a basic Mission System. Hereby Mission=Order, that's to clear your understanding. Missions
Notes:
Post Scriptum: The "Open Mission" system I propose is rather controversial, but is necessary, as it allows teamwork on smaller scale, aswell as missions for solo players and the zerg. Also "Mission Fulfilment Bonus", since "Mission Completion" doesn't sound that good from the pronounciation point of view. This is in fact a system based on the order system from Battlefiled 2142, polished, expanded and redesigned to fit PlanetSide 2.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
2013-01-18, 10:19 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #2 | ||
|
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Game Designer |
Just a few things to trigger some thought and discussion. I of course have no insight into mission design at all...
 1) Purpose. What is the difference between a "Mission" and an Order a squad leader gives his squad? Things like "attack a generator" could easily be done with a squad waypoint and a voip/text message by the squad leader. Simple and effective, and very flexible. What makes a mission special? What is its purpose vs squad-level command? What do YOU think its purpose is? 2) Scope. What is the purview of the Mission? Is it to get a single task accomplished? Is it to provide general direction to your empire? Is it to communicate needs and desires? 3) Scale. How many missions do you expect there to be at any given time? Too few and they may be overwhelming response or simply completed too quickly. Too many and most will go unaswered. How do you solve "mission creep" where over time more and more missions appear? We saw a lot of CR5 creep in PS1, so things like cert gates do not achieve a stable rate/number of missions. What do you think is a good Mission-to-player ratio? 1:10? 1:30? 1:50? Three important questions when talking and thinking about missions. How do you see the answers as a mission creator vs a mission recipient?
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 11:14 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #3 | ||||||
|
Contributor Brigadier General
|
Answer: Better indicativeness/illustrativeness, ability to communicate with other people through "signs" (which have higher "readability" than words) and most importantly - physical (if you can say so) reward, represented by XP bonus. Question: What is its purpose vs squad-level command? Answer: In this particular version mission system is in fact designed to promote teamplay: A) among "deaf squads" - squads of random people that can't be arsed to read chat/use VOIP; B) of inter-group property, like between outfits and squads of different origins; C) between minorities and majorities, like a big outfit putting up a supportive mission for smaller groups of people to pick up, or maybe even for solo players, that have only partial interest in teamplay activities. I say that from a standpoint of semi-lonewolf, from my own experience, sometimes you DO want to help your Empire and do some teamwork for a change, especially in times when it feels like you are the only one on your empire that has a clue. Question: What do YOU think its purpose is? Answer: General Purpose is to provide a simple, yet complex mechanic that allows "passive teamplay", that works as a "light version" of hardcore teamwork for zerg and players not generally interested in going hardcore. It also provides tangible reward. PS: As an extra mention, I can say that (in my head, perhaps) such kind of mission system would allow players to show a bit of creativity, or in other words it would result in some very interesting player-driven meta emerging.
TL;DR: 1 Mission Also in my opinion (and in fact my idea) is that the optimal mission-to-player ratio is 2 to 1 based on the minimal requirement to set a mission being squad leadership. This is how I think it should work, since mission system should first and formost benefit those people outside tight teamwork groups. TL;DR: 2:1 Ratio What's the logic then? Simple: On paper - "outfits equals coordination, so outfits need more coordination tools", "solo player equals alone, he doesn't require tools for teamwork". In reality though it's absolutely vice versa. Outfits are indeed coordinated groups by definition. But the truth is - if you don't give ANY teamwork tools to outfits, they will still be able to perform that very teamwork. A single player on the other hand doesn't have anyone around him, and taking away his ability to teamplay without entering a group, is a catch 22, where he doesn't have means for teamwork because he doesn't play in a team, because he doesn't have means for teamwork... TL;DR: It should benefit mostly players not tied to groups So my implementation is aimed to benefit ALL the player layers, but it does have more visible impact on uncoordinated group rather than coordinated.
__________________
Last edited by NewSith; 2013-01-18 at 11:52 AM. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 11:52 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #4 | ||
|
Major
|
Some good points here. The thing that stands out to me is that the mission system should work in squad/platoon only. Not empire.
You would get missions here there and everywhere which would confuse the average guy who already has a tough time figuring out the game. |
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 11:57 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #5 | ||||
|
Contributor Brigadier General
|
Afterall it's the small things that affect the outcome greatly.
__________________
|
||||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 12:48 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #6 | |||
|
Contributor General
|
Should missions be listed according to rank? E.g. A mission for a BR1 might be 'equip as Engineer, get a tank, proceed to nearest friendly outpost, identify the capture point' etc, in other words become part of an induction. A mission for level 20 and above might be to capture a named outpost or base and to have been a mission created by a 'leader', whatever one of them is. However, the last uncovers the problem that I have always had with the mission system. Who is the 'leader', who elected him, how do we know the mission is sensible. I don't know how any of that could be done. If we think back to the leaders from PS1, the CR5's. Many CR5's were active in chat, providing information and opinion. Often after a discussion an common way forward was agreed, but there was often people who disagreed and often they wouldn't follow the agreed line. Even after a vote was held there were still rebels. Occasionally the forces the rebels commanded were sizable. I don't know how this could be resolved within a mission system and tbh I don't think it should be. I think people should just 'talk' to each other.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 01:17 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #7 | ||
|
Contributor Lieutenant Colonel
|
This is mostly in line with what I hope for the mission system to be. The fact that it's not in is one of my bigger disappointments with PS2.
That aside, I would also envision such missions as 'Provide XXX vehicle/role in the vicinity of YYY area.' As well as things like 'Establish a no fly zone in the vicinity of XXX area.' Add a small space for the CR5 to add detail. The mission system should, in my opinion, identify a need on the battlespace (identified by what passes as CR5s nowadays) and aid in finding a person (or persons) who can fulfill that need. It should allow the CR5s and those who choose to participate, hopefully quite a few through the use of XP as a carrot, the ability to function as a coordinated army throughout the continent. A CR5 should be able to input into the mission system something to the effect of "We need 'this' and we need it Now(Soon/Before this base flips, etc)!" A function that would be nice, but most likely little used would give the option to automatically create a temporary voice channel with the CR5 and those who have 'accepted' a mission (such as a Gal Pilot, a Lib team or the SL of an infantry squad) for the duration of whatever mission is needed. Another function that could be of service would be a way for a third party CR5 'support' my mission. The name and outfit of each CR5 to check a tick box is automatically attached to the mission and adds 1% extra XP for those who fulfill the mission. This added functionality would hopefully add legitimacy to the mission request and ideally help network CR5s together. At the end of the day all this is nice, but for now please SOE, give us what you've got.
__________________
 Smoke me a Kipper, I'll be back for breakfast Last edited by bpostal; 2013-01-18 at 02:36 PM. Reason: additional functionality and clarification |
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 05:21 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #9 | ||
|
Major
|
What if the Attack and Defend icons squad leaders place on the map are a mission? Instead of making some A.I. system for what to attack/defend based on a fluid map, base value, player locations, and stuff. Have the players choose where the attack/defend missions happen.
Say if an outfit is having problems with an area. They can place an order to help with covering a flank or for pub players to attack a direction that they just don't have the men for. If this is done, then it would have to be limited HARD to keep from farming the extra XP and lower spam. Maybe only have platoon leaders be able to place the orders and on a 30-60 minute timer. |
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 08:30 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #10 | |||
|
Sergeant
|
So high BR players who qualify have some sort of pencil tool, with wich they can draw arrows on the map, just like you would IRL, a circle around a base means 'take this'. Obviously the battle plan should be staged, so what gets drawn first must be completed first or there won't be any bonus XP. something like this:  Something more finegrained like this would be cool too:  maybe we can have some sort of command map that's in-between the minimap and the world map with abstract unit symbols in the future? i am grinding my teeth over that everytime, the metagaming around that would be amazing: scouting mattering, positioning mattering, hierachies mattering, being organized mattering... talking about organization, whatever you end up doing, it needs to empower the organized vs. the unorganized to cull the zerg and reward outfit gameplay. to this end: - make scouting, positioning and all that tactical stuff matter - outfit ladders - since you've already delved down the avenue of dynamic XP, bonus XP when acting as a team/unit, XP reward by proximity check - there's definitely more but i am already straining the bounds of this topic Last edited by raw; 2013-01-18 at 08:42 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-18, 09:12 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #11 | |||
|
First Sergeant
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-19, 12:00 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #12 | |||
|
Captain
|
I think that missions should have a maximum amount of players that can accept the mission before it's locked out and you would have to select a different mission although I think think this could be scaleable for different missions and have a high cap of between 50 - 100. You chould also be able to see how many have currently accepted a mission. I like the OP suggestion of gen killing missions for sure and gen hold missions would be pretty cool but only if they add a gen that controls the base benefits. Old style gen hold need to return and need to have a higher purpose than what is currently available. One of the biggest things missing from tech tech up through today is a sense of direction and the mission system has been touted since the begining as the thing that is supposed to fill this void. I understand thaqt it's hard to do with only 3 conts but I have confidence that this is something that will improve over time. Thank you to NewSith for bringing this topic up since we have not heard much about since before beta. 
__________________
 
|
|||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-19, 03:47 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #13 | ||
|
Sergeant Major
|
I'd make sure there is some kind of in-game audio cue...
"Command requests... (various group designations -- squad A, plantoon B, general assault)... to (various attack/defend options -- destroy generator 1, capture assault, defend position) at (location)." ^Something like that. Would give our 'faction voice' some more work and I think it would make the system feel more immersive. |
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-19, 06:19 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #14 | ||
|
Sergeant
|
The automatic mission system needs to be targetted towards new players and those choosing to solo or run in small squads.
The missions these people are offered should be tailored based on where there are and the size of the group they are in. For example, your faction has just captured the base of allatum on indar, you were in the hex when it was capped. The mission system in the background should be able to see what the level of enemy activity is in that hex and all the surrounding hexes. Then on a squad by squad level offer "defend" this hex, "capture" this hex, "capture" this point, "defend" this point" missions. People can then choose to ignore or accept the mission. If this is done dynamicaly you should see a spread of troops as people move around completing missions for bonus XP, instead of just a big zerg going from base to base. This automatic system should also be able to have a vague idea of the type of resistance so can create such missions as "Air support needed at allatum", "Enemy ground armour spotted at quartz ridge" style missions. The manual mission system needs to only be available to people who have maxed out the current leader certs, and also purchased a new "mission" cert. They also need to be leading a platoon of at least 20? people before they can create missions. There also needs to be a mechanism in place for solo people to create missions for events and stuff. The manual mission system allows the creation of a more complex type of mission, with interlinked stages with bonus XP(capped so it cant be exploited) and the ability to add flavour text and map penis's. When a manual mission is entered into the system it should be made available to a random number of people, solo, small squads and of course the people in the creators platoon. The bonus XP increases (again capped) depending on how much action occurs and across how many hexes. |
||
|
|
|
|
2013-01-19, 11:15 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #15 | ||
|
Major
|
One important thing to think of is when will the mission start? and when will it end ??
Also is the mission bonus enough to draw farmers away from their desired farm to get points ? and mission credibility, who is just spamming griefing missions ? (just for the sake/leading troops to their deaths) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
