Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Because your other addiciction is illegal
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2004-03-10, 04:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #16 | ||
First Sergeant
|
I think that a radiator mine would be very cool. When a vehicle passed over it, it would explode and stick a more powerful radiator shot on the vehicle. The field would do about 150 damage. It would force the driver and gunner to abandon the vehicle for a time or be killed (and have their tank looted )
|
||
|
2004-03-10, 09:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #20 | |||
Major General
|
Cool Ok We have the AT gun, radiator What? No, you spawn in standard equipment for a reason. You were just brought back to life. Cool.
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-03-12, 08:16 AM | [Ignore Me] #22 | ||
1)Nope, it's a Vehicle transport, not a MAX transport, want to transport MAXs? Well you've got the galaxy or the Sunderer.
2)Erm, Not sure. I mean HE mines are bad enough, but if they added plasma into the mix... eep! 3)Apparently the radiator works.... not tried myself 4)Guess so. 5)Nope, you're supposed to be "naked" and helpless when you spawn from reconstruction after death. 6)Disable the guns, but don't disable the tank (like jammer nades do now). Would be easier to implement too. |
|||
|
2004-03-12, 02:59 PM | [Ignore Me] #23 | ||
Corporal
|
1) What about heavy Max Trans on ground carrying 4 Maxes and a Driver
2) Plasma Mines Would Do Minimal Damage To Vehicles and same as nades to infintry 3) Railgun will do minimal damage to Ground troops and max damge to Driver of vehicles 4) Just pulls boomers inline with other deployables 5) We Spawn With Guns, Why Not Ones We Want, But Still In Standerd Armor 6) guns can be disabled, but the movement of tanks cant, so the driver just mows u. Guns Will still work but tank is imobilized, the ground troops have time to flee since only one can be planted at any giving time(one per CE, To Clarify) |
||
|
2004-03-13, 03:23 PM | [Ignore Me] #25 | ||
In reply to superballs
1)Might be a good idea 2)In that situation, wouldn't HE mines be better anyway? 3)I'm not really sure I like the idea of killing people while they're in vehicles, sorta defies the point of being in an armoured vehicle..... basilisks/wraiths not included. 4)It's a consistancy factor yeah 5)Balance I assume. 6)Tanks are very vulnerable when they don't have their weapons. But just being stationary.... well how many times have you seen the driver repair the tank and the gunners covering the tank? I mean it's still a mean piece of kit. Escape? Perhaps from a magrider, but those Prowler and Vanguard Tank shells have nasty splash damage. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|