Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: nobody gives a rats ass...
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: How powerful should the Sniper Rifle be? | |||
It shouldn't exist. | 2 | 2.38% | |
No one-hit kills. | 10 | 11.90% | |
One-hits to head on lighter armours. | 56 | 66.67% | |
One-hits anywhere on lighter armours. | 13 | 15.48% | |
One-hits on MAXes. | 3 | 3.57% | |
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2002-12-29, 12:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #65 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
|
|||
|
2002-12-29, 12:39 AM | [Ignore Me] #66 | ||
Corporal
|
Dio,
Thank you for your compliments and your reply -- it's good to see we're more or less on the same page regarding snipers. I actually like your idea (a lot) about letting bolt drivers do heavy damage, but lowering their rate of fire, too. I don't think I'd mind dying to a sniper so much if he only had one chance, but still managed to put a slug through my facemask from 400 meters. And if he missed, hey - I'd have a grand ol' time tearing him a new arsehole in the middle of his chest. Just off the top of my head, I'd say that if a sniper had to load each slug manually (which they do), then steady and take aim, that would seem reasonable for a heavy damage tradeoff. The bolt driver and pistol only idea sounds really good, too. I'll admit, that's one of the things I worried about -- charging a sniper only to have him drop his bolt driver and whip out a rocklet as soon as I got close. Warborn, Thank you, too. I agree, we should probably pick up this conversation once we actually know how much damage the bolt driver does, but it's kinda fun to talk about it, anyways.
__________________
"<I>Nobody ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his.</I>" <B>-Gen. George S. Patton</B> |
||
|
2002-12-29, 12:44 AM | [Ignore Me] #68 | |||
Lieutenant General
|
But...wha...that's what i kept saying way back there(well minus the pistol only but again that was my idea).... oh well at least we both agree now. I think that would totally own. Make the sniping process a slow and hard one but deadly and his only shot because if he misses he only has a pistol. Very nice. Glad we *cough*I*cough* thought about it. Now if only Smokey can read this i agree with us. |
|||
|
2002-12-29, 01:00 AM | [Ignore Me] #71 | ||
Corporal
|
*chuckle*
Yeah, I suppose ya did, Dio. *scratches his head* Now that I think about it... bah, screw it - it's cool now.
__________________
"<I>Nobody ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his.</I>" <B>-Gen. George S. Patton</B> |
||
|
2002-12-29, 01:43 AM | [Ignore Me] #72 | ||
Sergeant
|
I'd be a thread Nazi too I'm afraid. I'm not saying i'm not open minded but I have low tolerence for people who don't know how to get their point across without sounding like an @$$hole. After 2 or 3 of those I'd close the thread and it'd have to start all over again. This, among many other reasons, is why I don't have my own website
Dancing spam is the coolest thing ever.
__________________
<img src = "http://www.nurospace.netfirms.com/sig_colio.jpg"> No one is perfect but sometimes learning from your mistakes can be enough. - Me |
||
|
2002-12-29, 02:27 AM | [Ignore Me] #73 | ||
Lieutenant General
|
Well i don't mind "people who don't know how to get their point across without sounding like an @$$hole." i just don't have much patience for a thread that was down 3-4 times already becoming yet another 10 page thread.
That or threads that are 80%+ flame or insults. I'd be a nazi yes but a good nazi serving the good of the community. (well the non flaming part) Edit: Oh and i'd be a nazi on your ass Carl! or should i say Mr. Spam to get Commander before 2k3. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|