Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: I didn't know they could reject these!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2011-08-15, 11:17 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Right now none have actually "got me". I'm keen on Cain, I think he has a lot of good ideas, I like Bachman's fire but I think it's gonna end up being Perry vs Obama come November.
As long as Huntsman, Romney or Gingrich have the nod, as it stands, I'd be happy. As for Paul, he'll never get the nod. He's not a bad guy, he's just... not a serious candidate.
__________________
Back from the internet! |
|||
|
2011-08-15, 11:24 AM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
PSU Admin
|
Not a serious candidate who raises millions and has made a good showing in this run, and the last one as well?
Problem is Americans are programmed to believe there can only be two parties far on one side or the other. Sad state of affairs really What's sad is what you are saying is true. |
||
|
2011-08-15, 12:24 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
There could be a third party, but it would have to be built from the state/local level on up. If a third party actually got a guy in the WH, you'd see the GOP and DNC work together to deny him any success. Is that fair? Or right? No. It's just life. Now if a Third Party had a presence in the House, the Senate and say, a few Governors Mansions...
__________________
Back from the internet! |
||||
|
2011-08-15, 12:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
PSU Staff
Wiki Ninja |
Ron Paul is the only one I could vote for. I don't agree with everything he says, but he's the only one that I think can truly fix the economy. His foreign policy views are very extreme, and that's the biggest thing I disagree with him on. Unfortunately, Paul's views are so different from the other candidates and how things are done in the country, that he'll never get elected. Things would need to change in small steps, not a giant leap like Paul would do.
As for the other candidates, they're too deep into religion. I found it hilarious that Perry holds a prayer rally so that god will fix the things that he was elected to do for Texas. Instead of coming up with ideas or trying to fix things, just pray...yeah, that will fix everything. Bachmann is even worse. Cain is pretty decent, but has no real experience (which he sees as a plus, but I don't think everyone else does). There really needs to be a viable 3rd party in the USA. We really need the Instant Runoff Voting system, where you rate your vote. Then you can vote for a 3rd party candidate and not waste your vote, as if that candidate isn't one of the top 2, the candidate you ranked #2 gets your vote. But unless Paul is the nominee, I'll probably just "waste" my vote on a 3rd party candidate. I can't vote for Obama or any of the GOP frontrunners. |
||
|
2011-08-15, 09:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
Before I fire both barrels, let me be clear, here - I am not an overly religious guy. I was raised Jewish by my mum. I'm non-practicing, and probably closer to agnostic than anything. My dad is a Methodist minister in the deep South and his wife is also a minister. I have a healthy appreciation for religion and its power. I can quote liberally at will from the Torah and the OT/NT. I just... I don't know. The skeptic in me was just burnt out by all the hatred done in the name of G-d... whether it was done by a Muslim, a ***, a Christian... I think I believe in G-d. I believe in something, I just don't know what that something really is.
Bachmann disturbs me on a level that no other politician has ever managed to disturb me (I don't count historical figures like Hitler or Genghis Khan as that was outside my lifetime). Not only does she lack a basic understanding of the things which I feel are important to a presidential candidate, but I cannot stomach the fact that if she is elected she will attempt to impose her religious beliefs on our way of life. She is utterly fucking insane. Her brand of religion is disgusting and abhorrent to me. She is Hell's Barbie. |
|||
|
2011-08-15, 11:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | |||
What absurd fears have you.
__________________
Back from the internet! |
||||
|
2011-08-15, 01:20 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
Palin 2.0 aka Bachman or any GOP nominee that can boast such stellar claims as being able to literally see their constituents hands being raised in approval from the white house.. who will usher in utter ruin to the party? Cant wait to find out!
Honestly I think the best case scenario would indubitably be Romney retaining the lead so that he can grasp the nomination, the myopic base of the GOP would be so "butthurt" with that prospect considering he is 'too weird' for them and after all he established that blasphemous Romney care for his state! Not to mention it would devastate those who deemed him a "souless" and apocryphal candidate last time around. Ah yes how bittersweet that would be.
__________________
Last edited by Sovereign; 2011-08-15 at 01:23 PM. |
||
|
2011-08-17, 12:26 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
We need someone who will bring more than Loose Change to the White House. |
||||
|
2011-08-17, 12:53 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | |||
Sergeant
|
People think the President can pretty much do what he wants, all day erry day. In reality, the choice comes to Congress. And I have to use Firefly's words when I say majority of those "politicians are shit". |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|