Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: If the NC had a PR Guy, it would be ALF
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2013-03-14, 04:53 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||||
Contributor First Sergeant
|
Hi all,
Saw this on reddit but no thread here about it. I'm pretty happy about this change as I think the way AT mines can be thrown around at the moment is pretty lame. What do you guys think about it? Is this the end of the suicidal anti-sunderer engie? edit: Higby did respond to the possibility that an engie could just explode his mines with a grenade. He also gave further details saying that any class could disarm a mine by shooting it. See the discussion here, important quotes below : '666 Westy543' who asked:
Last edited by Sonny; 2013-03-14 at 09:47 AM. |
||||
|
2013-03-14, 05:01 AM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
Now that would be very good! I like it
__________________
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. " Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms |
|||
|
2013-03-14, 05:47 AM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
YES! Will we be able to see actual minefields in the near future? I hope so.
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature *Disclaimer: When participating in a discussion I do not do so in the capacity of a semidivine moderator. Feel free to disagree with any of my opinions.
|
|||
|
2013-03-14, 01:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
First Sergeant
|
Hopefully people will start using them defensively on roads against upcoming assaults as they did in ps1. With the new hex system you should be able to predict battle flow better and you could potentially mine up an area pretty good before an enemy assault.
|
||
|
2013-03-14, 01:33 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
Private
|
Mines also exploded via proximity in Planetside 1, in addition to being used as defensive area denial. |
|||
|
2013-03-14, 01:55 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | |||
First Sergeant
|
Obviously defensive mining would be much different in PS2 as you have less, but more powerful mines that operate slightly different. Overall point, it would be nice to see them used as a preemptive defense strategy which I think will be good for game play, and a tiny step towards building more of that team/empire based strategic mentality which we eventually saw in PS1. Just my opinion though. |
|||
|
2013-03-14, 02:00 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | |||
Private
|
|
|||
|
2013-03-16, 06:42 AM | [Ignore Me] #10 | |||
Sergeant
|
I'm very much of the viewpoint that if you leave a Sundy unguarded and get mine-dropped, you deserve what you get. If an engineer can make it to a Sundy undetected and mine-drop it, he deserves the XP. I'm obviously in the minority though... |
|||
|
2013-03-14, 06:23 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Staff Sergeant
|
Mines actually working like mines hasn't broken any other games that employ them correctly (i.e. BF3 and PS1 to mention but them).
I don't care if it makes some people cry because they can't frisbee kill a vehicle anymore. Lamest thing ever. |
||
|
2013-03-14, 08:33 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
Master Sergeant
|
As frustrating as having your Sunderer insta-killed by mines is, this proposed change is going to cripple defensive efforts.
This game, as it is now, is about controlling spawns. If you attack, you have to push defenders off the points and corner them in their spawnrooms. As defenders, you have to take out enemy spawn points as fast as they come, or else at the very best, you have a never ending battle. If mines become a non-threat to parked sunderers, then Blockade armor will be THE defacto choice. That means Sunderers will become much stronger versus other vehicles and HA rockets. I've seen many "arguments" that a team using a sunderer should require a team to take out a sunderer. However, when I play, I see teams trying vainly to hold points (bases and points not really designed for defense) while one or two guys try to take out the sunderer. So the whole "suicide engy" vs. Team argument is flawed IMO. There IS a team effort against the Sunderer, it's just not all focused AT the Sunderer. THIS is what people fail to see and understand. Making Sunderers harder to kill is going to cripple defenses even more. One last point: I'll just spec into sticky grenades now. So it will be click-click-G instead of click-click. |
||
|
2013-03-14, 09:43 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | |||
__________________
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war, and now there ain't no going back. I mean shit, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it! If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight. " Slim Charles aka Tallman - The Wire BRTD Mumble Server powered by Gamercomms |
||||
|
2013-03-14, 10:51 AM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
I can't speak for anyone else, but if this makes it Live, then the second I can refund my certs, I will get rid of Mines on my engineer. In situations where I want to kill a Sunderer, I will resort to a HA with 2x C4 and a dumbfire rocket. I will also refund my Mineguard certs on my Sunderer... People that want their "minefields" can waste their certs and resources killing flashes, but I won't. This change will make mines not worth certing into, and will make Mineguard redundant. Get ready to see every non utility Sundy packing Blockade armor. Gratz on making Mineguard "not a requirement" while making Blockade the obvious choice to take since it reduces every other source of damage (can't possibly be biased towards Blockade, right!?) No one bothers to discuss the issue that defense is already VERY difficult. Making Sunderers harder to kill is only going to make that WORSE. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
higby, mines, update |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|