Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hold still!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2013-05-20, 12:36 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Private
|
I get that it's faster. But it's also weaker, and the tech plant requirement really just gives the side that doesn't have one a substantial disadvantage.
Back in PS1, when MBTs had dedicated drivers, the Lightning filled a niche. Here, it seems like role redundancy, doesn't it? |
||
|
2013-05-20, 12:41 AM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
No it does seem redundant.
But it does seem like you have contrived a fake point as a way to have yet another thread whining about the MBT driver.gunner arrangement.
__________________
Wherever you went - Here you are. |
||
|
2013-05-20, 01:25 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
Private
|
I just don't think that 50 resources, some speed, and an extra gunner seat is enough to separate a light tank from an MBT. They're too similar, and one feels like an upgrade to the other, rather than a separate vehicle that serves a distinct purpose. |
|||
|
2013-05-20, 12:47 AM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Colonel
|
This is a very good question, especially when Lightnings are so fast yet not stabilized for firing accurately on the move, though that also has to do with the design decision to have virtually everything buck you as you roll over it.
Last edited by Stardouser; 2013-05-20 at 12:48 AM. |
||
|
2013-05-20, 12:47 AM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
First Lieutenant
|
The cannons are about as powerful on a Lightning as a MBT primary, giving VS an alternative to their usual weaponry, and other factions a smaller MBT variant for solo use.
They cost less resources than MBTs, and are almost comparably armored, but are smaller and more nimble. When there's no tech, they are the ground vehicle with the most powerful AP cannon available. The limitation of having one gun is new to PS2, as the non-modular PS1 Lightning was fitted with a cannon and a machinegun for all targets. I'm hoping that one day we'll be able to pair any of the shell cannons with with the Walker, Basilisk, or Kobalt. Skyguards are nearly worthless for anything but air, as it is tough to get an angle and accurate fire on infantry, and the only ground vehicles susceptible to Skyguard rounds are Flash and Harasser. They move faster than MAXs and have optics, but I have a feeling that the Skyguard will all but disappear when the MAX speed run is implemented. Shells and a long-range scope are one of the most ideal uses for a Lightning. Shelling from a distance as artillery is very functional for supporting an assault, and is not particularly difficult to do, but some AA and AI support nearby should be present to fend off ESF or foot zerg attacks.
__________________
|
||
|
2013-05-20, 01:15 AM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Private
|
I think the Lighting has a place in the game.
The most meaningful thing they offer is, I feel, the different playstyle to the MBTs. I don't think you can say that driving a Lighting is the same as driving a main tank, even if you're TR and the difference in movement speed to your MBT isn't as accentuated. Just like MBTs can and will be solo'ed (especially when they still sport the basic Basilisk), but function best when in a team; the Lighting is valuable and designed as a solo, but when used in a squad with purpose it can provide means to flank enemy armor. Arguably this role's spotlight has been stolen by the newly introduced Harasser, but with the increased tank armour from the recent patch I feel the Lighting can still provide a valid alternative to this end. We could also recognise it has a unique role if outfitted with a Sky Guard turret; even considering the turret's effectiveness on the battlefield (I'll say no more on this, as to not go off topic). I feel the Lighting enriches the Planetside experience. And I like to think when the Lighting update finally hits, more people will start seeing it this way. I'll stop here, before I bore you with more words. |
||
|
2013-05-20, 02:25 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
Corporal
|
I've stated this in another thread before, but MAX's require support from engineers. With my Skyguard, I don't need any support. As an engineer, I can jump in my Skyguard, get to the fight quickly and I can repair my own gear.
|
||
|
2013-05-20, 02:36 AM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Major
|
- Faster.
- More maneuverable. - Better acceleration (important for dodging) - Smaller profile (important for keeping out of locks) - Faster reloading gun than Vanguard MBT - More linear damage-per-shot than Prowler MBT - Has main gun on a turret, above Magrider MBT - Cheaper resource cost - Lower cooldown - lower cert investment required personally I find lightning vastly superior than the Vanguard for solo play. because holy shit vanguard. SO SLOW. Last edited by AThreatToYou; 2013-05-20 at 02:37 AM. |
||
|
2013-05-20, 05:00 AM | [Ignore Me] #14 | |||
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature *Disclaimer: When participating in a discussion I do not do so in the capacity of a semidivine moderator. Feel free to disagree with any of my opinions.
Last edited by ChipMHazard; 2013-05-20 at 05:01 AM. |
||||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|