Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Harassar>Pedestrian
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2004-02-24, 04:26 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Private
|
Obviously Engineeres are a valuable asset to any squad, platoon, outfit, or anyone that has some sort of armor for that matter. So why not offer exp with that? I'm not saying that it should be any signifacant amount but maybe something like 2 exp to every 32 armor points restored? Base it on the ant run exp. Or maybe exp for a vehicle or armor succesfully completely restored. Nothing to much because if it is too high exp than it would be insanly easy for any engineere to catch rank. Just something for a little insintive for them.
I also think that this would make alot of battles for interesting and it would help to encourage ppl to take on the "support" role wich is so viltal to and battle. |
||
|
2004-02-24, 12:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #5 | ||||
First Lieutenant
|
|
||||
|
2004-02-24, 12:29 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | |||
|
||||
|
2004-02-24, 03:18 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
I don't see why Medical/Engineering activities should get experience. They're still just as effective at killing as anyone else, unless Med/Engi tools take up rifle slots now. And besides, you are, in a way, getting experience for resurrecting/healing/repairing allies. They'll therefore be able to stay in combat longer, and if they're in your squad or platoon, there's a good chance that they'll end up killing at least one more person, giving you some experience for helping them continue to fight.
I can't see Medical/Engineering tasks being awarded any real amount of exp without making it too easy to exploit and abuse, either. |
|||
|
2004-02-24, 03:43 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Well, a few things... 1) The vehicle repair tool does indeed take up a rifle slot. 2) Advanced Medic is 5 certs...at a low BR that means they have given up being an AV trooper, a MAX, a Sniper, or even a SA user. It is a sacrifice to become a support soldier and they are NOT always as effective at killing (Suppressor vs. any HA = dead). 3) Why SHOULDN'T they get experience for it? Are they not using their cert as intended? That's why ANT drivers get XP, they're using they ANT to do it's job. Same logic on the weaponry...when you get a kill you're doing your job. Why should support be second class? 4) They've giving up certs on the CHANCE that the guy they just healed is going to kill someone else IF they're in the same squad (which isn't damned likely). That's the kind of odds I'd expect in Vegas, and it's not entirely fair. Of course, the guy you just rezzed has no armor, so you need to fix that...what's that you say? I'm up to 8 support certs now? Boy...I'm glad I don't get any experience from this! Yes, a lot of systems would be open to abuse. I've said many times that medics should get XP from rezzing soldiers killed by enemy fire (something already tracked) and engs should get XP for repairing MAXes and vehicles below 50% armor. 20XP for repairs, 50XP from heals. Would take a long long time to get anywhere off those numbers. Exploiters would do better to get an ANT and a Galaxy and just fly around milking XP that way. Put in a mechanism to make it only enemy damage counts, and remarkably the system becomes almost self-correcting. Why? Because anytime you have a fight between two empires, a hot spot generally pops up, which then attracts Instant Action people (ask anyone who's tried to run some sort of duel). Does the system need to be well thought out? Yes...should it be in there? Yes. Support classes have been neglicted for far too long. |
|||
|
2004-02-24, 03:50 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Your last suggestion is invalidated by the fact you can play 2 empires per server, and the fact that giving negligable amounts of XP doesn't address the real problem. It lets 3 guys in a backwater tower milk the system for what is essentially free outfit points and XP, but it doesn't give ME a god damn thing. They shouldn't aim support certs at BR5s so they can level faster and drop them once they get to the higher BRs, they need to make them useful so high BR chars have a reason to cert in the damn things.
Edit: Combat Engy/Adv medic here, xp fixes nothing, fix the cert.
__________________
{BOHICA} |
|||
|
2004-02-24, 04:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||||||
The point I'm making is that you're asking why support should be a second class role, when support isn't even a role. Anyone who plays support only and doesn't use their weapon is not seriously playing with effectiveness and winning in mind, they're using a gimmick. The day that support people give up their ability to kill enemies with weapons is the day they become a role into and of themself. Right now, support is a little footnote after someone's real job, be it HA infantry or sniper or infiltrator or whatever. There are no non-combatants in Planetside.
|
|||||||
|
2004-02-24, 03:22 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Corporal
|
Giving exp to engi's and medics isn't a half bad idea who else but a medic (other than me) would run out into battle with relativley no gun. Yes I'm crazy....
__________________
This is my rifle, This is my gun, This is for fighting, This is for fun! " 'tis better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven" You know they call cigarrettes in England ****? Well, some one tell that cigarrette to shutup! |
||
|
2004-02-24, 04:38 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | |||
Sergeant
|
Warborn, in actuality, Adv. Med / Adv Engineering. Spitfires and a Motion detector around an AMS - Stops infil AMS Jackers. And I don't know about the non Europe servers, but our CE's do this a lot. One soldier I've forgotten the name of on Werner once was *the* reason we captured Voltan after a 5 hour battle, because she was Adv Medic and Engy, and kept rezzing our dead MAXes then repairing them, So the statment
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|