Removing Ceres from the recommended server list was a bad idea

[Lucecarentes]

Right after they stoped telling all of the newcomers to play on Ceres, the populations started getting unbalanced again. While we were the recommended EU server for a few days, the pops would usully be 30 or 31% VS and 33-36% TR and NC which was imo fine, it was enuf for the VS to have 33% pop on Indar and Esamir at least but now again we're struggling to sometimes even have enuf people on one continent.

Removing the recommended tag for Ceres was a very bad idea, SOE should've kept it for at least one more week

[Snydenthur]

But why should ceres be the only server that gets enormous amount of players? They have to change the recommended server to not piss off 3 other servers.

And keep in mind, warpgates were changed, so 4th faction moved on to tr to get the north warpgate on indar again. The same problem was at miller when I last played. 25% world population for vs.

[Phantomdestiny]

also i wouldn't complain Miller has never been the recommended server . Before Ceres it was woodman and then they will rotate again. But i really doubt Miller will ever get recommended because it is a pretty stable server now .

[Lucecarentes]

Originally Posted by Phantomdestiny

also i wouldn't complain Miller has never been the recommended server . Before Ceres it was woodman and then they will rotate again. But i really doubt Miller will ever get recommended because it is a pretty stable server now .

For me a stable server is when all 3 sides are relativly balanced, like in Woodman or Cobalt. In those two servers it's always 30-35% TR,VS and NC.
No 25% against 40% bs