Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Anyone atually remember what the BFR original name was?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2003-10-18, 03:37 AM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/10/17/net_speed031017
GENEVA - Researchers have more than doubled the world speed record for internet data transfer. Scientists at the CERN particle physics laboratory in Switzerland sent the equivalent of a full-length DVD movie in about seven seconds. Colleagues at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) received the data. The land record was set on Oct. 1 by transferring 1.1 terabytes of data over a 7,000-kilometre link in less than 30 minutes, the team said. The average transfer rate was 5.44 gigabits per second (Gbps), which broke the previous record of 2.38 Gbps � more than 20,000 times faster than a typical home broadband connection. Researchers announced the record on Thursday at the Internet2 conference in Indianapolis. Scientists want to transfer data more quickly for several experiments, such as simulations of the Big Bang. "This new record marks another major milestone towards our final goal of abolishing distances and, in so doing, to enable more efficient worldwide scientific collaboration," said Oliver Martin in a release. Martin is head of external networking at CERN. To accomplish the feat, the team paid for a special transatlantic fibre optic link with a capacity of 10 Gbps. Routers at both ends allowed the data to be sent more reliably. Written by CBC News Online staff
__________________
Back from the internet! |
|||
|
2003-10-18, 03:49 AM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
Member
Contributor |
i don't think that will be the 'norm' dl speed for a loooooooooooooooooooooooong time. Probly by the time i'm in my 70's.
I'll watch my grandkids playing on their PCs and be like "You whipper snappers. I remember back in the day I had to wait a whole 6 seconds for a pr0n pic to load" |
||
|
2003-10-18, 08:51 AM | [Ignore Me] #4 | |||
When I was 7, the fastest "internet" (might have been a few years later even) was a 5,600 BIT per second(thats .056KPS) watch WarGames, that is an example of one. 20 years later I have a 1MPS line... 5,600 to 1,000,000. in jsut 20 years. Think about that. When I was a kid we had an Atari 2600. That was the 1337 system. Today its an X-Box... Atari 2600 to X-Box in just 20 years. Scary part? Most of those advances have come in just the last 10. Imagine what 20 years from now is going to be like. You Grand kids will look at an X-Box liek we look at an Atari 2600 now.. I dread to think what they will say of that system.
__________________
Back from the internet! |
||||
|
2003-10-18, 10:46 AM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
Member
Contributor |
I agree Vich. But the way i see it is limits.
First, we reached the limit of the amount of data that could be transferred over a phone line. Then, we started putting cable and other broadband wires into people's houses. Now, we're approaching the limit of what we can economically get into the average person's house via high speed lines. The way I see it, the next wave will be wireless internet. People bringing their laptops with them wherever. You walk into a book store, open up your laptop, boom: your on the internet. No wires, no nothing. Again, we reach the point of limits. With wireless (keeping in mind that it WILL be the next wave), what's the choke point, economically speaking? |
||
|
2003-10-18, 11:17 AM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Well, all I can say is that I can't wait for RDSL. That's Realtime-Data-Service-Link. Think of being able to play PS in absolute realtime. No lag, no retarded death from being five feet from a moving vehicle. That sort of thing. Oh well, just a wish.
|
||
|
2003-10-18, 11:30 AM | [Ignore Me] #9 | ||
Major General
|
technicaly, thats OFN, but its bad ass ofn. the problem is, its Optical cable.....thats glass people, and glass breaks. but sooner or later, that guys Law....you know, the one that says technology will double every ten or so years, they say thats gonna break down here soon, unless they find some new way to make chips
|
||
|
2003-10-18, 11:43 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Actually, I am pretty sure they already HAVE a new type of micro chip. Why is it not out? Money. They want to milk things as much as possible, so processor speeds will gradually increase, instead of going from 3 gigs, to say 5 gigs, they'll do a 3.5, 4, maybe a 4.3, 4.6 and then a 5.
|
||
|
2003-10-18, 08:54 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Colonel
|
I duno. You know how hot a 3 GHz processor runs at right now? Something friggin' insane. I beleive a number I had gotten was around 200 farenheit. Sooner or later, Silicon is going to start liquifying under such extreme temperatures. Enter, the new type of microchip you mentioned: The Diamond Processor. Don't beleive me? Google around, I'm sure you can find some information on Artificial diamond-culturing for microprocessor uses.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|