Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Planetside, lifes a bitch.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2004-01-08, 09:57 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Lightbulb Collector
|
__________________
The gun katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The gun kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the master of the gun katas an adversary not to be taken lightly. |
||
|
2004-01-08, 10:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | |||
Major
|
I don't look at the bohica board, I have no clue what bohica is, and I would venture to say that most people on these boards do not visit the bohica boards either. |
|||
|
2004-01-08, 10:04 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Lightbulb Collector
|
I'm not ON BOHICA forums.
__________________
The gun katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The gun kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the master of the gun katas an adversary not to be taken lightly. |
||
|
2004-01-08, 10:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | ||
IMO, this is a bad idea. If we set up a perm station on the moon, we will end up ditching the Int'l Nat'l space station, which right now is a great thing bringing nations together working for a common goal.
I say we wait a LONG time before the moon or mars. (The article said bush wanted a moon thing for the anniversary of the wright bro's... that's only 8-10 yrs away)
__________________
|
|||
|
2004-01-08, 10:34 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Major
|
$500 billion dollars? That would cost every working American $2,000... I sure as hell don't wana pay $2,000 to put a base on the moon.
Take that $500 billion and put it into the National Ignition Facility; lets get fusion power this decade please. The benifits of clean power, and upwards of 1,000 times MORE power then what we have now (ie... cheap power) would change our lives so dramatically that I doubt anyone could fathom what life would be like... Instantly research would shift from combustion/fuel-based transportation to pure electric cars. Imagine going outside on a hot day and not seeing a haze over the downtown area of your city, not hearing the loud rumble of a gas engine, not paying $20 in gas for 300 miles of travel! What are the benifits to you or I for having a dome on the moon? That is one expensive status symbol, ehh? |
||
|
2004-01-08, 10:50 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Major
|
While I'm almost ready to agree with you, Squick, you're forgetting about all of the spinoff applications that the developments for such a program would have.
They might turn out to be more substantial than fusion, at least in the short term.
__________________
-Seer |
||
|
2004-01-08, 10:55 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
General
|
its all about being intimidating and one step ahead of everyone else
__________________
Take what you can! Give nothing back! |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|