Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: My trigger finger is getting tired
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2012-04-10, 05:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
While researching my tactics site I came across the different section sizes in military forces around the world. Also talked to my old second in command, DarkDragoon who went off and led real world tank units about his experience.
Now PS had 10 man squads, but what do you think PS2 should have, and why? |
||
|
2012-04-10, 06:01 PM | [Ignore Me] #3 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
I would say 12 Dave. The reason is 12 can be divided into so many nice numbers. Also its bigger than PS1 numbers For example:
1/12 2/6 3/4 4/3 6/2 12/1 Now unless your lone wolfing you should really always be teamed up with one other, in pairs at least. So I say 12. |
||
|
2012-04-10, 06:03 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Yeah, 2 combat pairs in a fire team and 2 or 3 fire teams in a squad gets my vote. So either 8 or 12. 12 makes it more flexible for those that want it, as you can always not have more people in the squad if you do not want them.
|
||
|
2012-04-10, 06:28 PM | [Ignore Me] #6 | ||
Sergeant Major
|
the bigger the better. with the amount of people that are going to play the game there will be alot of people wanting to play together. i would like 15 an squads and 45 man platoons. or maby commanders can cirt to make bigger squads.
|
||
|
2012-04-10, 07:08 PM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
Colonel
|
If squads were 12, then it would be difficult for people to be dedicated gal pilots outside of their squad, since nobody would want to leave a man. Last edited by CutterJohn; 2012-04-10 at 07:12 PM. |
|||
|
2012-04-10, 06:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
I feel like 8 is a better number than 10. The first thought most people (even myself) I feel have about reducing the number from the old game is that it is bad. Honestly though I think 8 is a nice solid number and is easier to manage and coordinate than 10. Lower doesn't have to mean bad, there are upsides too.
|
|||
|
2012-04-10, 06:12 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
i would like if squadsize equals a full crewed galaxy. what´s that? 12?
for obvious reason. i always liked the idea to be able to put the whole squad into one transport for a full squad hotdrop. having to leave someone behind would suck. and platoons can be seperated into one galaxy hotdrop squad, one air escort squad and one vehicle attack squad working together. (if or when platoons will be reintroduced)
__________________
***********************official bittervet********************* stand tall, fight bold, wear blue and gold! Last edited by Shogun; 2012-04-10 at 06:14 PM. |
|||
|
2012-04-10, 10:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #13 | ||
Lets split the difference between 10 and 12. I think 11 is a prime number for squads!
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
|||
|
2012-04-10, 11:11 PM | [Ignore Me] #15 | ||
Contributor First Sergeant
|
1 - Squad Leader
Fireteam Alpha 2 - Alpha 1 (Leader) 3 - Alpha 2 4 - Alpha 3 5 - Alpha 4 6 - Alpha 5 Fireteam Bravo 7 - Bravo 1 (Leader) 8 - Bravo 2 9 - Bravo 3 10 - Bravo 4 11 - Bravo 5 I actually wouldn't mind this. They don't have to use nato phonetics ofc
__________________
NivexTR - TR - 30/5 - -=The Black Sheep=- SYNxNivexQ - NC - 26/4 - [:::::SYN:::::] NivexVS - VS - 19/2? - SYNDICATEVS? http://www.twitch.tv/nivexq I don't broadcast much, but you never know Last edited by NivexQ; 2012-04-10 at 11:13 PM. Reason: Removed the quote because i was stupid |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|