A2A missiles...

[MFour]

If I remember correctly, the A2A missiles were buffed in the latest patch. So... another attempt to destroy air? It isn't much fun to be the guy with the chaingun trying to get some fair strikes on enemy aircraft only to get three A2A missiles on my tail and since they're much harder to evade now as I understand it, it's pretty much instant kill. I used to be able to fly around TI Alloys and do some damage to enemy air and ground, but now I cannot most of the time shake off the missiles... same is for the rest of Indar and the other continents... now this may sound like I'm whining, but a 500 cert insta win weapon for air does seem a little bit overpowered to me...

[NewSith]

I actually agree - missile speed buff was a good thing, but the A2A Missile ammo capacity should have been reduced to minimal to balance that patch.


G2A rocket now work awesome and balanced, but A2A missiles and their 10+ capacity make a problem now.

[maradine]

Originally Posted by NewSith

G2A rocket now work awesome and balanced, but A2A missiles and their 10+ capacity make a problem now.

Who's got 10? I thought I was hot stuff with 5.

[NewSith]

Originally Posted by maradine

Who's got 10? I thought I was hot stuff with 5.

I have no clue how many, tbh, I only know you can take out a Liberator with A2A without resupplying which makes it 5 at least. So this is obviously an exaggeration, hence the ten, it can be "dozen" if you like.)

[maradine]

Originally Posted by NewSith

I have no clue how many, tbh, I only know you can take out a Liberator with A2A without resupplying which makes it 5 at least. So this is obviously an exaggeration, hence the ten, it can be "dozen" if you like.)

Which is considerably slower than Turblolasering them into oblivion. What's the issue here?

[NewSith]

Originally Posted by maradine

Which is considerably slower than Turblolasering them into oblivion. What's the issue here?

ESFs are the issue.

[EVILoHOMER]

They'll keep nerfing aircraft to useless because they cannot fix the real problem of the game and that the base design.

[Gatekeeper]

I'd actually say one of the big balance issues for ESFs is the fact that the starter loadout features a fuel-tank in place of a secondary weapon.

Making both rocket pods and A2A missiles unlockable upgrades means that unupgraded ESFs are crazy weak in comparison to upgraded ones, which in turn makes air rather pay-to-win compared to the rest of the game.

I'd suggest replacing the starter fuel-tank with some kind of light rockets or missiles that are moderately effective versus both ground and air - but weaker than A2A missiles/rocket pods against their intended targets. That would be much more consistent with the rest of the game design.

[ShadetheDruid]

Originally Posted by Gatekeeper

I'd suggest replacing the starter fuel-tank with some kind of light rockets or missiles that are moderately effective versus both ground and air - but weaker than A2A missiles/rocket pods against their intended targets. That would be much more consistent with the rest of the game design.

Or have the afterburner tanks certable, so you can improve things like capacity/regen, or speed. Basically make the afterburner tanks have a viable advantage over pods or missiles (especially the latter).

[Gatekeeper]

Originally Posted by ShadetheDruid

Or have the afterburner tanks certable, so you can improve things like capacity/regen, or speed. Basically make the afterburner tanks have a viable advantage over pods or missiles (especially the latter).

Making the afterburner certable makes sense, but TBH I'd place it in a separate category to secondary weapons - either in one of the existing slots for defence or performance or whatever, or give it a new slot all to itself with a few different options (long burn but slow recharge, fast burn with quick recharge, etc.)

My preferred option would be to have a straight trade-off between having flares or having an afterburner (and not just a crap afterburner or a better one - if you have flares you have no afterburner at all).

[maradine]

I actually don't mind that the AB is a secondary weapon - I have an interceptor fit at level 3 that just screams. That massive tank lets you dictate engagement pace and range at will. I didn't think so when it was my only option, but now that I have a few thousand certs into my bird, it makes a big difference.

[Lee]

At first I wasn't really into air as i'm not really a pilot, then I bought A2A to provide a little bit of AA. It was good at first when not that many ppl was using them, and my role was mostly to counter the rocket spammer (without abusing the A2A missiles though).

Now it is constant BIP BIP BIP, and now that I have started to improve my flying, making air pursuit more interesting and less missile-shot-n-forget, the air fights are just depressing.

Guess I'll put back my reaver in the garage and will mostly use it for fast transportation...

[karlchiu]

If you are a pro pilot, you can easily use face to face combats and other tactics to evade A2A missile spam. If you use A2G missiles, obviously you will lack the ability for A2A combats. If you use A2A missiles,you would not have that much infantry killed like the A2G missile pods.

[belch]

Originally Posted by karlchiu

If you are a pro pilot, you can easily use face to face combats and other tactics to evade A2A missile spam. If you use A2G missiles, obviously you will lack the ability for A2A combats. If you use A2A missiles,you would not have that much infantry killed like the A2G missile pods.

I dunno about pro being a qualification, but basic competence in manuevering the airframe for sure. Mainly, getitng in close enough and jinking around the adversary long enough to make his ability to lock impossible. At least that's one solid technique.

[Emperor Newt]

Ah, that's air to air combat... I always wondered what those strange rotation contests in the air are good for.