Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hamma's watching. Think happy thoughts.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
2013-02-24, 07:51 AM | [Ignore Me] #5 | |||
First Sergeant
|
I do hope they balance these well, they better not be better than the starting pistol. |
|||
|
2013-02-24, 10:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #7 | |||
Master Sergeant
|
Why the hell have something like that on such weapons? I always found that unnamussing. =x On a second note, yes, we want all weapons to look differently, thank you. Keep it up SOE |
|||
|
2013-02-24, 12:16 PM | [Ignore Me] #9 | |||
You'd think this would also equate to a higher average bullet velocity than the other factions but this doesn't appear to be the case. This is one of the reasons why the most popular NC weapons are the ones that have rate of fire and clip sizes more common on TR and VS weapons, because the unforgiving nature of the low-RoF gauss-assisted weapons is problematic in a game where accuracy tends to be less important than one's ability to mash the spacebar and spray bullets at the target. |
||||
|
2013-02-24, 08:35 AM | [Ignore Me] #12 | |||
Sergeant Major
|
Id rather they bring back the old VS weapon designs. The old Pulsar looked tenfold better then the current one (which looks exactly the same as every single carbine/AR/shotgun/lasher/LMG for VS)
^ VS AR design ^ VS carbine design. Right click > View Image for bigger pics
__________________
Last edited by Koadster; 2013-02-24 at 09:21 AM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|