brave new world

[kidriot]

we ought to have the choice whether or not a boomer is attached to us.

have it strapped on the chest so it explodes forward.

surge into a base, click click boom. or a vehicle terminal during a zerg fest. or a busy ams.

[GRiND]

but but that would make us terrorists

[beavis88]

That would rock, but it'll never happen...

[kidriot]

yah cos obviously the idea of death is very sensitive to people

(not really)

[Sp3ctre]

I think it's a great idea, but it's too insensitive inlight of the current Israel-Palastine suicide bombers and the whole Al-Queda stuff

[�io]

PC* ownz j00!



*Political correctness

[Tryndamere]

Too insensitive?

By that rationale we shouldn't blast each other with guns because of the Iraq war (or Columbine).

And we should remove the towers from the game because we're being respectful for 9/11. Gimme a break~

[Robot]

PRAISE ALLAH

[Sp3ctre]

It's Religious insensitivity. I dunno, just suicide bombers - Kinda sick

[Peacemaker]

Palaside or Planetsine???

[Plato]

Terrorist and terrorism are words used way too loosely. It is not terrorism to sacrifce yourself to destroy a military target even if you are wearing a bomb belt.

I don't want to see suicide bombers in Planetside because I do think it would be insensitive w/ the middle-east situation.

[afex]

gg PC sheep

[Onizuka]

well, since you dont die in the game, and in real life you would if you did this, its not a kamikaze suicidal al-queda method. Therefor i think its a great idea.

[�io]

I myself could care less if that would be an option. I mean in the name of PC we should all bounce off each other when ramming something/someone with an aircraft out of respect for 9/11.

[Seer]

You know, suicide bombing isn't exactly a great military tactic. You're liable to kill more people (and accomplish more) via the skillful use of weaponry in concert with a team of coordinated individuals. It's a bad idea for the same reason you can't, for example, swallow grenades. There is just no reason to.