Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Got Auraxian wood?
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2002-12-22, 10:49 AM | [Ignore Me] #33 | ||
Contributor PSU Staff
Code Hound |
In reality a MAX would not build up more momentum than a bullet on its way down. A fly can have the same kinetic energy as an 18-wheeler truck if the truck is moving slowly. The max is heavy, yes, but the bullet which is moving MUCH MUCH faster would still have more energy. It's also more concentrated on a point.
__________________
powdahound.com |
||
|
2002-12-22, 01:37 PM | [Ignore Me] #34 | ||
I'm with the Vanu
|
We Vanu have magic powers, and these magic powers are what makes it so you take less damage when you fall. If you want to stop a bullet we have a magical implant that will do that for you, because, well, its magic. I would tell you how this magic works but its a high up Vanu secret that only a few of us know, and we wont tell the rest because...uh....we dont trust you. End of discussion.
On a side note i think they should call the shield implant an IDF, like in infantry. |
||
|
2002-12-22, 02:50 PM | [Ignore Me] #35 | ||
Sergeant
|
The concentration on a point is the important part! But I say the MAX would still have more kinetic energy falling then a bullet out of a gun would. Imagine the MAX landing with one foot and on the bottom of that foot was a spike whose tip was the size of a bullet. Which yould you rather get hit by? I guess it really depends upon the height at which the MAX dropped from, but at terminal velocity it most centaily would have more momentum then a bullet. The mass of a max would be what... about 1000 kilograms? Maybe even more! So you are talking in the range of 5 orders of magnitude larger then a bullet. Is the speed of a bullet 5 orders of magnitude larger then the speed of the falling MAX?
__________________
|
||
|
2002-12-23, 11:34 AM | [Ignore Me] #36 | ||||
Dragoon Admiral
|
Jeezus Mess! I don't post for 2 days and you h8 me already?
Plus, the "you make me sad" portion (and pretty much the entire thing itself) was written in humor, albeit a dry and sarcastic kind. I guess I assumed everyone know's what I'm really thinking. But oblivioius is my middle name, so I guess this happend. This whole thing I don't take seriously AT ALL. So if you don't want to continue, that's also fine. You win! ... But not because you're right. **edit: The reason why I acted more "hostile" in your eyes was probably because the former post by YOU called for it.
__________________
My old sig is gone... I reformatted. Last edited by Zarparchior; 2002-12-23 at 11:38 AM. |
||||
|
2002-12-23, 06:35 PM | [Ignore Me] #39 | |||
Corporal
|
Mass has NO bearing on the falling speed of an object. None. Area does, gravity does, mass does not. It does however paly a very large role when it hits the ground. But none in flight. |
|||
|
2002-12-23, 06:44 PM | [Ignore Me] #40 | ||
I think they were discussing how a kinetic dampener would work when striking the ground after falling from an airplane. So I took it as kind of a given that he was talking about when the objects hit something (the ground, a person, whatever), not necessarily while they are in flight.
|
|||
|
2002-12-23, 06:48 PM | [Ignore Me] #41 | |||
Corporal
|
|
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|