Originally Posted by opticalshadow
i dont think gore desenstizes people, i mean we had a dark ages, we had ww2, we have the news.
|
Yes, because the people that went through the Dark Ages are still alive. Even the WW2 generation (especially the people involved in combat) is dying out.
A person's sensitivity to violence, a person's apathy towards it, is individual not genetic. Even if you talk to someone who's seen real violence, it isn't the same as seeing it for yourself. I mean, sure, if we were all the same people with all the same memories, sure, that would make sense but...
Video games and graphic news do desensitize people. Much like the presence of nude sunbathing can and does desensitize people to the naked bosom in those nations and cultures that embrace it. If you constantly hear about something or witness something you are less likely to be shocked by it.
I'm not saying people don't know the difference between games and reality. However, this thread is in and of itself a great example.
In this thread, people are asking to spend money to see blood and gore, and not to promote realism or increase immersion.
Think about that for a moment. Unless you're a psychopath, actual blood and gore is not attractive. People's intestines strewn about the ground is not pretty. At least not to me and most others. So why is it that people would want to see it in a game?
People are desensitized to it, even to the point asking for over-the-top gore and blood to get a "satisfying feeling." Because apparently shooting them until they fall over just isn't satisfying. It isn't special.
All that said, I am not against it... I would never waste perfectly good money on gratuitous gore, but I do believe that if people really want to fund it, that's there's choice... however sad it makes me that people would make that decision.