Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Save me! Don't hit refresh!
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-05-21, 10:58 AM | [Ignore Me] #35 | ||
Corporal
|
The Lightning is Vanu's MBT because it does more DPS and dodges better than the craprider (learn how to point sideways to strafe, it's way faster and a smaller target than the derprider). That is the purpose of the Lightning.
|
||
|
2013-05-21, 11:35 AM | [Ignore Me] #36 | ||
First Sergeant
|
If and when they make MBTs 3 person, then the lightning will have a more defined roll as the tank for the solo tankers.
TBH the more I use the harasser, the more I want someone to throw out that tired: "You'll have to FIND a gunner" argument at me again, because this is what happens: "/o Guys, I have a Harasser pulled, who wants to g- oh, well nm, who wants to ride in b- oh, uhm... nevermind, full up." I think the 3 person MBT will be about the same. The more I dwell though on what was said by Higby the other day about making the tertiary gun on the MBTs better, the more I hope there is some kind of tool or inventive weapon styles ontop of tanks in the near future, not just the same old tired guns. |
||
|
2013-05-21, 03:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #37 | ||||
Private
|
The Lightning should not be an MBT alternative or sidegrade, it should be a different vehicle with a different role. That doesn't mean that MBTs have to have a dedicated driver. It does mean that the MBTs should be stronger and more expensive. Last edited by Aiden; 2013-05-21 at 03:06 PM. |
||||
|
2013-05-21, 03:51 PM | [Ignore Me] #38 | ||
Why shouldn't the lightning be a slightly less armored/effective MBT for less cost and wider availability? There's reason enough to pull it, as I see them all the time.
It can deal MBT main-cannon level damage with less stand up survivability but better speed/maneuverability. It doesn't hold up too well against a decent tank driver 1v1. I find it a bit better at infantry killing than a mag. The only thing I find not so great about it is the Skyguard. But I'm reluctant to want a buff because AA is already ridiculous.
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. Last edited by Rbstr; 2013-05-21 at 03:57 PM. |
|||
|
2013-05-22, 04:49 PM | [Ignore Me] #40 | |||
Does it look like Goatse now or something?
__________________
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. |
||||
|
2013-05-22, 05:27 PM | [Ignore Me] #41 | ||
Private
|
I love lightnings, cheap on the resources and needed when you don't have a tech plant or aren't near the warp gate.
They are great to escort sundy's versus a slow MBT as well. Personally I like to hit and run with the lightning. They are fast and quick enough to get behind MBTs to get a couple of rounds up their butts. |
||
|
2013-05-22, 06:07 PM | [Ignore Me] #42 | |||
Corporal
|
and compare it to the old sexiness So yeah, Halberd it is. Anyway, this is a Lightning thread after all, so here's what I use for my Lightning:
Last edited by Corvo; 2013-05-24 at 04:02 AM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|