SOE removing the tactical aspect of camouflage, good or bad?

[Angrytortoise]

Honestly never really found Camo coverage on vehicles to offer much of a tactical advantage in the first place aside from maybe the harasser or lightning...I mean lets face it you're not going to confuse a Mossie for a Reaver or Scythe unless you're completely blind (same goes for MBT's), and not too many situations where you really heavily blended with the terrain.

Cosmetically I'm still dealing with the fact that my scythe looks like a giant purple horned abomination (and not in the good way) while wearing any purchased camo; but if that cosmetic change was a necessary precursor for something really cool like vehicle hacking then I'll suck it up and just leave the default colouring on my vehicles and call it a good trade off.

"edited" Just read Higby's response on camo coverage, guess we're getting the best of both worlds relatively soon. That'll teach me to just skim a thread.

[Mastachief]

Originally Posted by ringring

Am I the only one who thinks that camo should not have any tactical value in the first place?

Nope i think the same. But how would they make money.