Unreal mod goes too far - Page 2

Khronos · 2003-08-02, 01:26 PM

IMO that is crossing the line..

Lonehunter · 2003-08-02, 01:29 PM

I think that Unreal MOD and the game I mentioned cross the line. I believe in freedom of speach but, damn, games like that

ho · 2003-08-02, 03:28 PM

i would think it was very wrong if you were the terrorist but whats wrong w/ beinga fireman or a cop trying to save peoples life?....

ho · 2003-08-02, 03:31 PM

i mean in CS/SoF2 you are the terroist killing americans and those are heavily played and accepted games

[i play both]

Lonehunter · 2003-08-02, 03:34 PM

Originally posted by -ho-
i would think it was very wrong if you were the terrorist but whats wrong w/ being a fireman or a cop trying to save peoples life?....

I don't think that's how this game is. But that would be ok.

ho · 2003-08-02, 03:47 PM

it said you play as...cop fireman or civilian...how else would it be played?

Everay · 2003-08-02, 04:31 PM

now, we live in a republic ( even though your told other wise, and in all actuality, we lost that republic to democrocy because of a presidents name that just sliped my mind ) but you see, this country was founded with the idea of individual freedom,( though at the time that excluded blacks ). the most important part of individual freedom is freedom of speech, and this goes under that, now im not saying that its a good thing, no, i hate it, but if we let our "morales" get infront of what we were givin, (this country) we undermind that gift, you see the greatest thing about this country is that were supposed to be free, to do what we want, but since we let our morales get in the way, we have been losing this country, such as the right to smoke marjuana,, indivdual freedom means we can do this, but because they said it was bad, we can no longer. and if we continue to follow these "morales" we will lose all of our freedoms. its like the Stimcell research, Millions of people will die before the age of 30, or live their life handicaped because of the higher ups not understanding stimcell research and useing their "morales". Now im not saying morales are wrong, their a good thing, but when a person, in the highest position in the word, uses his morales, his rights and wrongs, to tell us what to do, thats bad

understand what im saying or do i need to clarify more?

niplan · 2003-08-02, 06:20 PM

The ultimate destruction of a free society, morals, and ethics.

Mr1337Duck · 2003-08-02, 06:27 PM

They have the right to make a game, but it's a really bad idea because gamers are pretty low on society's ratings. Society loves jocks, cheerleaders, strippers, musicians, but the lowly gamer is left behind because his art tastes involve killing little virtual people. Things like this give people a very bad view of gamers.

Navaron · 2003-08-02, 06:32 PM

Originally posted by Mr1337Duck
Society loves jocks, cheerleaders, strippers, musicians, but the lowly gamer is left behind because his art tastes involve killing little virtual people.

Gamers are not artists. Seriously. I think society likes gamers more than strippers. Would you bring a stripper to meet you grandmother? She probably already knows some gamers.