Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: That internet thing just might catch on one of these days...
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-09-07, 06:09 PM | [Ignore Me] #1 | ||
Well it seems to be everyone is saying Get a Radion 9800Pro and dont get a radion9800 non pro.....This is all fine but is their anything wrong with the GeforceFX5900 (256mb). I have a small delma, the computer dealer that I am buying from will only put a Radion9800 non pro which is a 128mb or a GeforceFX5900 which is a 256. I know that most of you are Radion Fans but help me out here. Tell me any info that you can on why i should get a GeforceFX5900 or why not.
|
|||
|
2003-09-07, 07:32 PM | [Ignore Me] #2 | ||
bottom line. I have a radeon, have had radeon ever since my old GF3... but the fx5900 is da shitl. just look at any review... nvidia has finally gotten thier heads out of thier asses... infact with my next paycheck i plan on picking one up.
but dont get the 256mb one its not worth all the extra money. hell quite honestly its not even worth and extra 20 bucks.... it doesnt benefit the average or even hardcore gamer in anyway.... |
|||
|
2003-09-07, 08:29 PM | [Ignore Me] #4 | ||
I'm a loyal nVidia user .. have been for many years. While the thought of a Radeon is tempting, between the two choices you have, go with the GeForce .. you won't be disappointed.
Just upgraded from a TI-4200 and the FX5900 is killer .. I have the 128mb version though. Enjoy!
__________________
~ Kuraltai |
|||
|
2003-09-10, 03:07 PM | [Ignore Me] #8 | ||
Second Lieutenant
|
The 5900 does not "beat" the 9800 Pro. I'm not saying the 9800 Pro beats the 5900 either. Both cards are the best out right now, have excellent drivers, and can out perform the other depending on platform and benchmark cheats (I mean optimizations).
As far as planetside goes, its a toss up. As for games soon to come such as HL2 I think it will perform better on Ati. But Stalker is very likely to be better on NV. DM3 is going to be flakey and do 25 fps if your lucky on either. I prefer the ATI camp b/c the product cycle is much more reliable. They meet their release dates. The r360 will be out before to long and NV will still be at the drawing board. The r400 will be out and ppl will be lucky if there is test silicon even ready for the next NV board. But as far as your two choices, the 5900/256 is clearly better than a 9800 NP. So if performance is worth the money to you, get it ofcourse. |
||
|
2003-09-11, 01:05 PM | [Ignore Me] #10 | ||
Private
|
the radeon 9800 non pro is alot cheaper than either card, and it can be OCed to practically match them. the 5900 ultra and the 9800 pro however are about on par with eachother. they are both awesome top of the line cards right now and you cant go wrong with either one.
i went with the 9800 non pro though, its only 250 bucks, and I have OCed it to speeds even faster than the 9800 pro |
||
|
2003-09-11, 01:38 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Private
|
Nothingis wrong with geforce i guess i went with it cos a 256mb 5600 (yes im not super rich and cannot afford monster cards) is way way way cheaper than the equivilent radeon and perfroms just as well with patched 3D-mark to get rid of optimaization plus mine came with a 3 games plus an ok demo disk also it runs planetside beutifully now I have an athlon 2600 on an MSI nforce 2 board and MSI geforceFX 5600 256mb it runs brill with a bit of help fiddiling with things in planetside config
__________________
H3ratic.co.uk I've really got to clean of all those nasty NC's from the front of my mag |
||
|
2003-09-11, 07:55 PM | [Ignore Me] #12 | ||
daleon your right bout ATI pwnin in HL2 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1862
__________________
Thanks to Eine for my awesome sig |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|