Banned, I was BANNED! - Page 5

Navaron · 2003-01-13, 08:48 AM

The last thing America needs is another Roosevelt.

"british. the royal marines led it, bush used british special forces for operations INSTEAD of using delta force for ex.
hes a knob" - Wow, America is a lot more powerful than I thought. Shit, we can order around *other* peoples SF's. Cool.

You're a moron. I don't even know where to start with you. I'm not gonna, just go make up some more facts, bash someone who you obviously know nothing about - and then go back to your "independant thoughts".

mistled · 2003-01-13, 04:23 PM

Originally posted by Zanzibar
troops invading afghanistan british.

wtf is 'afghanistan british'??

So basically you are saying that you don't like Bush because you dislike your own leadership. That makes a lot of sense. Crazy Brit.

- That is the shit that Bush can order around European Special Forces. I like him even more now.

Sputty · 2003-01-13, 04:28 PM

Britain probably requested to have their special forces be a leader in the attack. Canada's special forces were used also. They're called JTF 2. Weird name and no one relly nkwos anthing about them. a bit of CDN history BTW. The use of JTF2 and the fact that they gave prisoners immediately to the U.S. without telling the PM led to our minister of defense being fired..heh..

mistled · 2003-01-13, 04:52 PM

**Removed** Got my people I was replying to screwed up.

Sputty · 2003-01-13, 04:53 PM

I didn't sy anything earlier about Bush using British SF, that was Zanzibar

mistled · 2003-01-13, 04:59 PM

Sorry Sputty, trolling through too quickly I guess.

Sputty · 2003-01-13, 05:01 PM

No problem. I as just saying realistically Blair would want to get more votes(I don't thinkn it's working, alot ofmpeople hate Blair) by saying his SF were a major part of teh attack. SO he most likely asked. Canada "offered" to send in thier military too. U.S. used it because it looks better to have multiple countries rather than the U.S. attacking it alone.

mistled · 2003-01-13, 05:04 PM

Originally posted by Sputty
No problem. I as just saying realistically Blair would want to get more votes(I don't thinkn it's working, alot ofmpeople hate Blair) by saying his SF were a major part of teh attack. SO he most likely asked. Canada "offered" to send in thier military too. U.S. used it because it looks better to have multiple countries rather than the U.S. attacking it alone.

.. And Americas are whiners when it comes to send their boys to war.

Sputty · 2003-01-13, 05:06 PM

I don't really know about that. Maybe, not sure though. Never head of anything like that but CDN news is pretty crappy.

mistled · 2003-01-13, 05:14 PM

The people I know are very happy to have their freedoms, but the idea of dying for those freedoms makes them weak in the knees.

Suprisingly, having lived within 30 miles of three major military bases in my life, I find that the people whose family members are actual soldiers and therefore the one's dying are the one's that are the least squimish about war.