Petition: Bigger Lockers

[321]

Yeah I agree more br more locker space.

[Peacemaker]

More favorites would own too.

[TheN00b]

More favorites? Ten isn't enough ?

[Peacemaker]

HAHAHAHAHA You dont have Rexo do you?

Id like more veh favs especially

[TheN00b]

I do have ReXo. But I suppose the bug my computer has that makes it so that I can only have 2 favorites would twist my opinion .

[Fenrys]

More stuff in lockers = more server strain = more lag. No thanks.

[Vick]

Originally Posted by Fenrys

More stuff in lockers = more server strain = more lag. No thanks.

huh?

[Dharkbayne]

Originally Posted by Fenrys

More stuff in lockers = more server strain = more lag. No thanks.

That wouldn't cause any lag. Derrrrrr....

[TheN00b]

Fen, what are you talking about? Bigger lockers wouldn't mean more lag, I think...

[Kaymon]

Originally Posted by Fenrys

More stuff in lockers = more server strain = more lag. No thanks.

That wouldn't cause lag. There are thousands of people firing thousands of bullets and the server has to make sure everyone gets the data back and forth. Making the locker bigger wouldn't cause any more lag than tripling the ammo box on the Striker did.

Code changes are what cause lag. This isn't code. (Damage, physics, that's code. A locker size change is right in there with the ammo patch. No code)

(Edited because I misspelled something so bad my old English teacher would hunt me down and smack me silly if I didn't correct it)

[BigFreak]

Originally Posted by Kaymon

(Edited because I misspelled something so bad my old English teacher would hunt me down and smack me silly if I didn't correct it)

You spelt to wrong, didn't you?

[Kaymon]

Actually, it was the phrase "Code changes are what causes lag". I misspelled half the words, and made a nightmare of a grammatical error.

"Cod echanges is what causs lag"

I'm having an off day...

[Fenrys]

Every time you open a locker, data about the items in that locker is sent from a database to your computer. This consumes bandwith.

Larger lockers would mean more data would have to be sent, consuming more bandwith.

Larger lockers would also mean a larger database about what is in players' lockers. Meaning it will take longer for the server to dig through said database to find the enteries for an individual player whenever they open their locker.

More data to store + more data to send = more lag.

[TheN00b]

Give me a break, Fen, that's an infentesimal amount of lag, even if every player on a server was opening and closing their locker non-stop.

[BadAsh]

Originally Posted by Fenrys

Every time you open a locker, data about the items in that locker is sent from a database to your computer. This consumes bandwith.

Larger lockers would mean more data would have to be sent, consuming more bandwith.

Larger lockers would also mean a larger database about what is in players' lockers. Meaning it will take longer for the server to dig through said database to find the enteries for an individual player whenever they open their locker.

More data to store + more data to send = more lag.

Now I want bigger lockers more than ever. Some of the people I smack around come up with creative excuses in their hate tells. My new goal is to recieve a "Locker Lag" hate tell/got owned excuse!