Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: The website that watches back.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

View Poll Results: What should the Devs Focus on first?
Sandbox persistent World only...no PVE or Arenas 97 79.51%
Arena/PVE Only....E sports FTW! 1 0.82%
Sandbox Persistent world...PVE and Arena maybe later 19 15.57%
Arena/PVE....Then focus on Sandbox 0 0%
Sandbox persistent world...Pve along side PVP later 5 4.10%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2012-06-28, 01:47 PM   [Ignore Me] #1
Dreamcast
Major
 
Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


This is what is going to come down to.


The developing team is only so big so they are going to have to use their resources for only one of these things most likely.


So what do you guys want the Dev team to focus on?



Personally I want them to focus on a Sandbox persistent World, I want them to expand the Massive Warfare to Space with Starships and moon battles.

I want them to make outfits have more power and give empires have more consequences if they lose....I want Empire related continents...I want to raid a starship with troops etc.


or


Do you want PVE and Arena type server games with 50 vs 50 players...playing in their own little world?


I could see a PVE continent or planet working if is along side a PVP and part of the persistent world....no dumb horde mode crap.



So what do you guys want the devs to focus on?
Dreamcast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 01:51 PM   [Ignore Me] #2
Senyu
First Lieutenant
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


I'm going to let someone else handle this one
Senyu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 01:54 PM   [Ignore Me] #3
Eyeklops
First Lieutenant
 
Eyeklops's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


I totally expect a bittervet bias on this poll. However I will hopefully break that by being the first vote with "Sandbox Persistent world...PVE and Arena maybe later"
Eyeklops is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 01:54 PM   [Ignore Me] #4
Goku
Contributor
PSU Moderator
 
Goku's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Last thing I want is any sort of PvE. Waste of development time. I wouldn't mind seeing some kind of instanced PvP for outfits to go up against each other every now and then. However I don't want real match making to the point it becomes a true style of instanced gaming or a true alternative to the MMO part of the game. I'm all for a Sandbox type of game eventually as they stated thats were it may go. I would prefer keeping it at most a FPS centered one with maybe EVE like qualities.
Goku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 01:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #5
Tatwi
Contributor
Major
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Fighting on a asteroid or moon that has lower gravity could be fun. Blow someone up and watch their corpse blast clear off the rock and into space... of course, in this scenario I would have a great view of said rock while I drift away...

SOE is part of the Sony Playstation umbrella. Compared to just about any other MMO studio, SOE have the resources to do whatever they could possibly imagine, so I am not limiting them to the choices put forth in this poll.
__________________

Last edited by Tatwi; 2012-06-28 at 01:59 PM.
Tatwi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:01 PM   [Ignore Me] #6
Conq
Staff Sergeant
 
Conq's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Arena/PVE Only. Just cause.
Conq is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:01 PM   [Ignore Me] #7
diLLa
Staff Sergeant
 
diLLa's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Missed the choice of Sandbox first, and arena maybe later without any kind of PvE.
diLLa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:01 PM   [Ignore Me] #8
Sabot
Second Lieutenant
 
Sabot's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


The sandbox persistent world with whatever it may include, hands down. Build on that and there's no telling where the game might end up. So many possibilities!

Speaking of adding things... a little OT this. But I tihnk developers shouldn't be afraid of taking things they've added (in patches or expansions and stuff like that) out of the game completely again if it isn't working well in world.

Typed a whole lot more on that, but I'm not going to hijack the thread so.. I took it out ;P
__________________
Sabot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:03 PM   [Ignore Me] #9
gufftroad
Corporal
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


i wouldn't mind arenas too much as long as it doesn't detract from the sandbox pvp and honestly the only pve i could see working is maybe having a random base on the front line be taken over by a grey faction and which ever empire gets it back first get a boost of resources from it for a day or two

Last edited by gufftroad; 2012-06-28 at 02:03 PM. Reason: i am bad at the spellins
gufftroad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:08 PM   [Ignore Me] #10
Sirisian
Colonel
 
Sirisian's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Originally Posted by Senyu View Post
I'm going to let someone else handle this one
Might as well have a go at it since Dreamcast hasn't read the other threads on these subjects.

Originally Posted by Dreamcast View Post
Personally I want them to focus on a Sandbox persistent World, I want them to expand the Massive Warfare to Space with Starships and moon battles.
Separating anything from the core continents is a failed idea. They tried it with the caves and battle islands and players did not enjoy it. Anything that removes the trinity of infantry, ground, and air is not possible. You cannot remove playstyles from the game and that's what space combat would do. It creates specialized areas that require new vehicles and other gameplay elements and adds very little to the core game.

This is actually the same idea why naval combat would never work in the game.

Originally Posted by Dreamcast View Post
Do you want PVE and Arena type server games with 50 vs 50 players...playing in their own little world?
These are two separate concepts. I've probably been one of the strongest opponents of PvE. The community is nearly 100% against NPC based PvE (where players are fighting non player AI). The core game is PVP centric, and adding combat that pulls players away from that is detrimental to the gameplay.

Arena based gameplay where outfits fight each other has a few threads now. Bringing that up again here would be a waste of time.

Originally Posted by Dreamcast View Post
I could see a PVE continent or planet working if is along side a PVP and part of the persistent world....no dumb horde mode crap.
Most people that want this don't refer to it as PvE. That has the connotation of getting experience or rewards for killing the wildlife. Refer to the creatures and wildlife threads for a rundown of people's basic ideas for this.

// edit, also thanks for making another worthless poll with biased answers. Can't even vote in it without supporting someone's pre-existing definition of PvE.

Last edited by Sirisian; 2012-06-28 at 02:11 PM.
Sirisian is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:12 PM   [Ignore Me] #11
fod
Master Sergeant
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


not interested at all in PvE and arenas
im playing planetside for the big sandbox :P
fod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:18 PM   [Ignore Me] #12
kaffis
Contributor
Major
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Your poll is invalid. There is no "none of the above" option.

I definitely don't want to see PvE.

I don't think Arenas would complement the core game mechanics, and I don't want core game mechanics or balance issues upset by catering to arena mechanics.

I don't think "persistent sandbox" play is really relevant or interesting, unless you include erecting destroyable cover and turrets via the engineer class "sandbox play." The last thing I want to see is big outfits deploying bases and then refusing to fight anywhere else because they need to defend their base. If what you mean by "sandbox" is following our own goals and objectives without quest-style tasks... well, we've already got that.

Last edited by kaffis; 2012-06-28 at 02:20 PM.
kaffis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:21 PM   [Ignore Me] #13
DarkChiron
First Sergeant
 
DarkChiron's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


What I really want to see is PvP arenas in Little Big Planet. Because, it makes sense in the context of what kind of game that is.

Right?
DarkChiron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:28 PM   [Ignore Me] #14
The Degenatron
Master Sergeant
 
The Degenatron's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


PVP Sandbox first and foremost. That IS Planetside.

However, a couple of years down the road, I can see a place for "arenas". An example of something like this would be the Trafalgar, Spillway, and Seaside maps from Global Agenda (except bigger to acomidate 600 players 3x200). Winning these smaller maps could net global benefits and be a stage for real e-sport events.




Last edited by The Degenatron; 2012-06-28 at 02:34 PM.
The Degenatron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2012-06-28, 02:29 PM   [Ignore Me] #15
Policenaut
Sergeant
 
Policenaut's Avatar
 
Re: Sandbox Persistent World vs PvE and Arenas


Can't say I'm a fan of the poll options, so I'll chime in with my .02 cents. First off I just want to say that I never want to see PvE. It's an MMOFPS and fighting against real players will always be far more exciting than than shooting NPCs. Second, I wouldn't mind arenas being added at a later date, but having said that I do not want them to ever take precedence over the persistent open world and large scale battles.

I think arenas would be a nice addition to have, for example, for outfits on the same faction to duke it out. It's not unheard of for clans/guilds/outfits to have rivalry among each other, and arenas would be a good outlet for that rivalry without racking up the grief points. But at the same time if they were never added in, I wouldn't be crushed.

To iterate, when I play Planetside 2, I play for massive battles and the persistent world. If I want to play an esport or arena style shooter, I'll play a game that's specialized for it.
Policenaut is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.