1 SC = 1 cert ? - Page 4

Snipefrag · 2012-11-03, 04:45 AM

I have to say my perspective is closer to Evilpigs than any other view. Paying to speed up game processes is not pay to win in my books, being able to buy a BFG that one shots people from 100 yards is. If you think PS2 can survive without 'pay to speed things up' then you're dreaming :|.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Athanasios · 2012-11-03, 05:03 AM

It's simple.

1) I have 1 hour now and then to play PS2.
2) I don't want a sticker on my window, i want another playstyle.
3) I will pay to get that playstyle.

Hmm... who was using that "playstyle" word? Was it Higby? Was it Smedley? Was it Isaac? Was it maybe EVERYBODY in SOE?

Yes, it was all of them. IF they make that gun i want imba, it's THEM making the game P2W, not me. It's their job to assure (as they said in thousands times already) that each "unlock will promote another playstyle, you will still be able to kill -if you have skills- whether you play with the default equipment or that super duper level 99 weapon".

In the end of the day; Some people have tons of free time and they can progress as they want without paying a dime. Why me, who i don't have this luxury, not pay to catch up? How can the first deny this right to the second?

Both are customers for SOE. The first because he keeps the "base load" of the game running. The second because he pays and contribute to their actual wallets directly. If i was SOE, i would want both of them to play my game.