VTOL vs STOL - Page 2 - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: Finger lickin' good
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2013-02-19, 04:27 PM   [Ignore Me] #16
CraazyCanuck
First Sergeant
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


Yeah hard to dogfight with such a low celing. I've been trying to improve at the low flying acrobatics and using the terrain more. Usually go to Amerish to "practice" maintaining the "Freddy Flintstone" style now, but can get a little over confident. Wish my joystick worked properly with PS2.
CraazyCanuck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 04:27 PM   [Ignore Me] #17
Riekopo
Sergeant
 
Riekopo's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


I don't think it's a gravity problem. I think it's a problem of unrealistic inertia and physics. It also seems like there is a continuous thrust being generated from all sides of the aircraft. If more realistic physics were implemented into the flight model then that would fix this I think. However, the aircraft would then need to be redesigned. The ESFs could be made into dedicated air superiority fighters and the Liberators into dedicated gunships. Maybe a new fighter-bomber and bomber could then be introduced and a resupply galaxy.

Last edited by Riekopo; 2013-02-19 at 04:30 PM.
Riekopo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 04:53 PM   [Ignore Me] #18
maradine
Contributor
Lieutenant Colonel
 
maradine's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


There wasn't much appetite for a more complicated and realistic flight model early on, but I'd be pleased to learn that's changed.
maradine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 05:10 PM   [Ignore Me] #19
Rothnang
Major
 
Rothnang's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


I think the easiest fix to the whole hovering thing would be to make fighters roll and pitch much slower if they aren't at speed. That way if you're slowing down for a landing or to drop missiles on someone it won't severely impede you, but if you try to turn your fighter into a floating turret that simply wouldn't work.

More dogfights, more bombing runs, less hover-turret.
Rothnang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 08:23 PM   [Ignore Me] #20
Obstruction
First Sergeant
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


everyone wants to change everything in the main forum. i thought there was an "ideas" forum for that? this is the area to discuss current gameplay. i come here to see if anyone has done testing on different cert lines or weapons, check out cool videos and read discussions about patch notes, hotfixes, weird bugs, etc.

i avoid the SOE forums and the ideas section because of the butthurt whining and nonsense changes that people want. you honestly have no idea what the smallest changes are going to do in a game this complex, so you have to change one small thing at a time or else the whole thing could start to suck so fast you wouldn't believe it.
Obstruction is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 08:40 PM   [Ignore Me] #21
Sirisian
Colonel
 
Sirisian's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


Originally Posted by Obstruction View Post
everyone wants to change everything in the main forum. i thought there was an "ideas" forum for that? this is the area to discuss current gameplay. i come here to see if anyone has done testing on different cert lines or weapons, check out cool videos and read discussions about patch notes, hotfixes, weird bugs, etc.
I think you're in the wrong thread. This is obviously a discussion of the gameplay of flight in this game and some of the implementation issues after trying different cert lines and their gameplay in regards to ground combat.
Originally Posted by Obstruction View Post
you honestly have no idea what the smallest changes are going to do in a game this complex, so you have to change one small thing at a time or else the whole thing could start to suck so fast you wouldn't believe it.
Indeed. That's why I suggested not making a large change from VTOL to STOL. There are minor changes which would just repurpose the existing cert lines. For instance hover would allow a person to hover more efficiently using less afterburner where as a dog fighting frame would give high efficiency in forward flight. Very minor changes without requiring runways or removing airpads from the game.
Sirisian is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 11:37 PM   [Ignore Me] #22
Baneblade
Contributor
Lieutenant General
 
Baneblade's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


Aircraft shouldn't be able to fly below 50% speed unless they are landing, and to land or take off requires VTOL mode, which has a capacitor. Capacitor should be strong enough to handle even the worst take offs and landings, but once it is depleted, you better be moving or your ass is ground bound.
__________________
Post at me bro.

Baneblade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-19, 11:57 PM   [Ignore Me] #23
Rothnang
Major
 
Rothnang's Avatar
 
Re: VTOL vs STOL


More hover restrictions make sense for fighters, but for the bigger aircraft that's hardly feasible. They can't engage in dogfights anyways, so they don't ruin air battles by turning them into hover dances.
Rothnang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
  PlanetSide Universe > PlanetSide Discussions > PlanetSide 2 Discussion

Bookmarks

Discord


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.