Originally Posted by Mag-Mower
Double post, sorry
1. Not true, PS2 is easily capable of reaching life-like graphics, why dont companys make life like games on the PS2? they are too fucking lazy, PS2 and XBox are capable of the same thing
2. I disagree, the PS2 controller feels much more comfortable
3. This one is True
4. Good point, but lets say you wanted to show of your car collection in Burnout 3, you can do that with the PS2's memory card, and lets say, for some reason you have 2 XBox's because you like to link, and your main console (with all of your saved games) breaks? or lets say your HD breaks? then what are you gonna do? atleast with the PS2, you can transfer one set of data to an other console...
5. Yea it does, but that doesnt mean its better, like i said befor, developers are too fucking lazy to optimize code and all that crap.
PS2 wins
|
1. No. No it's not. PS2 cannot reach the graphical power of the Xbox.
2. That's a matter of opinion, personally, my hands are big, and the PS2 controller feels way too small, and square, and after playing for about 30 minutes, my hands begin to ache.
3. True.
4. They have memory cards - You just don't NEED them to save things.
5. Yes it
DOES mean it's better. Compare any PS2 exclusive game to any Xbox exclusive game.