The Conservapedia: If Wiki is too scientific for your simple religious mind. - PlanetSide Universe
PSU Social Facebook Twitter Twitter YouTube Steam TwitchTV
PlanetSide Universe
PSU: I'll REK you, you stupid hacker.
Home Forum Chat Wiki Social AGN PS2 Stats
Notices
Go Back   PlanetSide Universe > General Forums > The Lounge

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2007-03-16, 11:48 AM   [Ignore Me] #18
Ait'al
Contributor
General
 
Ait'al's Avatar
 
Re: The Conservapedia: If Wiki is too scientific for your simple religious mind.


Maybe the native americans didn't use the wheel. So what. That is atleast interesting to think about. Who else would have brought that up. Depending on what you are trying to study that could bring up alot of interesting areas to go into. If you were studying native american culture or other aspect of their cultures. To say they went how many thousands of years and never apprently seemed like they needed the wheel. Or some of them did(assuming that is the case) is something interesting and a reason to start studying something. So it is perfectly useful information.

And just to derail this. Why is the argument of what to teach in science class about evolution. When was it ever scientific? It's one things to bring it up, like any other theory, but the nature of a theory is that it is a theory. So why not do what we should do about the theories of gravity and teach them as unknown information. As is we don't know why it happens, or even if what we call it has anything to do with reality, or if it technicaly exists (We know things fall as we define it with langauge. But we don not know the reason or interaction that makes it happen. Unless I am mistaken. Which could easily be the case!!). So This whole thing is a mistake, and is wrong simply because they are zealots and teach any theory as being scientific and not teaching it in perspective. Problem solved. Stop letting "evolutionist" teach science since they are outwordly biased and hence unscientific. That subtle lv of biasedness makes you dangerously unscientific and stupid. So we just go back reconstruct info on real life. The fact taht we don't know. And start teaching why people think things stop trying to say wether they are right or wrong since it goes against the point of science and leave it all alone after that. Isn't the point of science classes in highschool just to introduce you to science as a whole. Not to indoctrinate into any specifific beleif about specific theories or wether they are right or wrong? So whose correct then?

Last edited by Ait'al; 2007-03-16 at 12:26 PM.
Ait'al is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
  PlanetSide Universe > General Forums > The Lounge

Bookmarks

Discord

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.

Content © 2002-2013, PlanetSide-Universe.com, All rights reserved.
PlanetSide and the SOE logo are registered trademarks of Sony Online Entertainment Inc. © 2004 Sony Online Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks or tradenames are properties of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.