The Conservapedia: If Wiki is too scientific for your simple religious mind.

[Ait'al]

Yea but I still think science has to strictly be the study of something. Making formulas wouldn't be math. I think studying math and giving the study of it a name could be considered science. I don't think the using of something counts as a science though.

And Phythagareoms theorom will always work. Becuase like a shape. It is a predefined thing. So yes it will always work. It is in a way like a hypothetical situation. It can not be altered to not work. It cannot be made not to work. Like any algebraic expression or basic programing situation. Except in programing you have a sub langueage and things to mess it up. The basic principle if it could be as defined in math would always work. If math didn't work taht way computers could not work. And programing would be an imposibilty. It will not work out logically. There are some things you can figure out to work or not work. It was probably known well enough I even learned it in school at some point.

As is it is a definition of a situation within a predefined situation. So it will not cease to work. How can you get it to not work. It is only the mathimatical eqaution for a triangles lower side. YOu can already check all possible numerical situations. Which ones wouldn't work outside of the inability of our number system to define something properly or not being able to get a calculator that can hold enough numbers if that even ever happens with it. Either way I think it is still to practical to be that kind of study. It's more like engineering. It's not a science. It must by nature be applicable If I'm not mistaken. If that is the fine line. I'm pretty sure there is something that defines it as seperate from a science. The only problem with pythagareoms theorom would be the decimal system wouldnt it?