Who in your opinion poses the biggest threat?
I'm all for the disarming of Saddam but, I feel that N.Korea is far more of a high stakes affair. I believe that situation needs to be resolved first. Look at it this way....
The world is divided on the Iraqi issue. I think it would go a long way to help heal some of the rifts made during this Iraq debate if the world was unified with dealing with N. Korea. By having a unified security council dealing with the matter diplomatically or forcefully I think will give everyone a much needed break from being at each others throat. Dealing with N. Korea could give the inspection regime more time which would appease the french, german, and russian spineless cowards. (even though i believe they have had enough and pussy countries like russia, france, and germany have no balls when it comes to enforcing resolutions... I remind you that they voted in favor of resolution 1441 which stated "serious consequences" if Iraq did not comply... noone thought that meant... hey man lets draft another resolution and continue inspecting under the false idea that Iraq is complying. Bottom line is Germany, Russia, and France have a biased intrest in Iraq... if they stop us from attacking or prevent the UN from disarming Saddam then they should be next on the list because then they are just as guilty as Saddam.)
So anyway.... your thoughts? Are we in the right part of the world right now? Should N. Korea be dealt with first? If it were up to you..... what kind of diplomatic approach would you take to N. korea or the Iraq situation? could your idea solve the problem? please share.
Remember.... Keep it civil please.... name calling and flaming need not apply. you may quote someone to refute their point by stating WELL THOUGHT OUT opinion or plan fact via news reports.
Last edited by KoldFusion; 2003-03-06 at 07:17 AM.
|
2003-03-06, 06:36 AM
Threaded Mode