| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
PSU: because we can.
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
|
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-04-09, 03:48 PM
|
[Ignore Me] #1 | ||
|
Sergeant
|
Ok, I completely understand the need for an anti-infantry MAX, and an anti-vehical MAX, but why two anti-vehical MAXs (one "anti-vehical" and the other "anti-aircraft"). Won't the anti-aircraft MAX be useful for only 15% of the time? Or are there enough aircraft constantly zooming by to keep them busy.
__________________
Merlin "Even wizards carry guns." |
||
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode