| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
PSU: Spelling optional.
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
|
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2003-06-08, 04:42 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #1 | ||
|
First Sergeant
|
Judging by performance of each nation on the battlefield, how would you define their roles? e.g., TR believe in a lot of lead in as little time as possible, does this make them better suited for close in, toe to toe combat, or is it more complicated than this? Input by you more PS experienced people (beta players...) would help fuel the discussion
__________________
 This is my rifle, this is my gun. This is for killing, this is for fun. |
||
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode