I'm curious to this.
Let's go from the start. Netarun posted a thread titled "Help out disaster victims, you heartless fucks". A total of one person posted in this thread before the title was changed. People carried on posting, critiquing the thread. Netarun was obviously offended by this, for he replied each time when someone posted something negative. It was then locked.
Netarun posted a second thread, titled "Help out disaster victims, you happy nice beautiful folks!". Squeeky then proceded to insult Netarun. I try to put the thread back on track, but it doesn't work. People start flaming Netarun left, right and centre. People then proceed to derail the thread. Squeeky makes it his personal crusade to "shit on this thread". I am ashamed at PSU for doing this. Sure, netarun might have been abit silly with the massive text. That doesn't give people an excuse to bait him into replying. Wasn't one of Squeeky's conditions to be unbanned to not flame people? He's just broken it by doing that to netarun's thread.
The thread was then locked and netarun was banned. This is the point of the thread. I would like the admin who chose his decision to explain their reasons in doing so. My personal opinion is that it wasn't a very good decision, but that doesn't matter.
Is this how PSU treats our new members? I'm pretty ashamed at what PSU did in those two threads and to netarun.
|
2004-12-28, 06:05 PM
Threaded Mode