Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: Hrmm.. I dont think Hamma likes RPGs very much..
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
View Poll Results: Do you like the new fixed turret on the Magrider? | |||
I play as VS and like the new fixed turret | 7 | 17.95% | |
I play as VS and prefer a swivel turret like the NC and TR | 11 | 28.21% | |
I play as VS and prefer a swivel top and a tank that's more similar to the NC and TR | 1 | 2.56% | |
I don't play as the VS and like the new fixed turret | 8 | 20.51% | |
I don't play as the VS and prefer a swivel turret like the NC and TR | 5 | 12.82% | |
I don't play as VS and prefer a swivel top and a tank that's more similar to the NC and TR | 1 | 2.56% | |
Other opinion | 6 | 15.38% | |
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2011-09-21, 01:01 PM | [Ignore Me] #11 | ||
Contributor PlanetSide 2
Game Designer |
The concept of whether the gun is fixed has nothing to do with the damage it deals because the damage it deals is simply a balance tweak. BF2142's main guns on all tanks was equivalent so the only difference was the fixed gun strafe handling.
It boils down to a simple truth - the concept of the fixed main gun has been shown to be effective in another game. Talking about all the other balance issues with the magrider are irrelevant to whether the concept of the fixed gun is flawed or bad design. They can always change damage numbers. They can always tweak strafing rates. That is something trivial to change that will likely change many times throughout alpha and beta. Judging the fixed frontal main gun in the context of other flaws of the magrider is just dumb. It doesn't make sense and shows your logic to be poor. |
||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|