Originally Posted by Stardouser
BF3 already isn't Battlefield, it's CoD with permanent vehicles now.
Just like PS2 isn't going to be PS1, it's going to be PS1 with a big touch of Battlefield and CoD.
The key for BF is, it could have been something vastly different from both BF2 and BF3 and pleased everyone, but it wasn't, it was BF3, and that only pleases CoD fans.
PS2 still has hope. It can still be different from PS1 yet only take from BF and CoD those things which will allow the game to please everyone. But if it goes too far in easy mode casualizations like killcam(I KNOW this is not currently planned to be a problem, just listing it as an example), 3D spotting and other stuff, that's certainly not going to endear it to Mordor.
|
I personally believe that PS2 is leaning more towards Halo on a lot of features, the TTKs look similar, shield play will likely be similar and so on. I'd say consider the game PS1 with a flavour of Halo but with ground progression (in reference to the pace people push up) akin to Battlefield. Bearing in mind that progression will be hampered by slower TTK and much larger numbers.
That's my take on the infantry side of things anyway, from what we've seen. Vehicles are something else altogether though.
2012-03-23, 08:35 AM
Threaded Mode