I don't care so much for being an NDA police per se, what what annoys me is smartasses going around fairly direct rules set on the forums by twisting some semantics and technicalities. If Hamma has wished that these forums are not to be used for sharing footage that is under NDA, why can it not be respected instead of doing it so that it may not break a rule, but still does the exact same thing than the original thread that was closed for a very good reason?
The point that bothers me the most is trying to go around it. Being a forum moderator on other forums, it's somewhat hilarious when people try to go around the rules by doing similar technical roundabouts and then QQing when the thread gets closed or they get punished. It would work if this shit was automated, but it doesnt quite work against manual moderation
That said, I do despise people who can't respect an agreement they have agreed to follow. Now this has nothing to do with this thread per se, but the poster of the video. I think breaching an NDA or any agreement is, while first and foremost a legal thing, but also a spit to the face of SOE in this case. He gets an amazing opportunity like this and decides to breach the NDA first chance he gets, meh. As for this thread, Hamma has asked PSU not be the place to share these videos (even if the thread wouldnt directly do it, it is extremely easy thanks to this thread), but still people have to try their luck with threads like these :/
But I guess more on topic of the video content we're not supposed to talk about or share:
I would somehow like to see the turret speed limited too, in addition to the instant enter/exit and hotswapping seats being worked on.
2012-07-17, 07:53 AM
Threaded Mode