| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2012-09-21, 10:05 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #39 | ||
|
Sergeant
|
nice follow up. sarcasm on: It looks like we didn't count the electoral college votes.. I DEMAND A RECOUNT!!!
 No but seriously, people who like tanks like to shoot the main battle gun. The reason why people are asking for a crew split is because they want to play something similar to Arma... This game, was not meant to be a simulator. What I think should happen is, the overall vehicle performance should increase with the more people you have in your tank. It's better to give incentives rather then take away. For instance, if you have a dedicated secondary gunner, the accuracy and loading time should increase. Here is another one, the secondary gun should change to whatever the gunner wants. This means mounted guns are swappable upon entry if the driver desires. Ideas like this would make sense! I think we need to be a little more creative, then going back to whats in every other massive war game. Also, keep in mind this is supposed to be a futuristic game as well. Our modern military fly drones into war already, and from what I understand in 2015 there will be an unmanned armor division as well. It is highly unlikely in any kind of future conflict people will actually man mbt's. http://www.military-today.com/apc/black_knight.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiesel_AWC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardium just my 2 cents
__________________
Scythe iPimp'ology I http://youtu.be/yuWPPZVhX3c Magrider iPimp'ology I http://youtu.be/hO08Rw1onbw Last edited by Ipimpnoobs; 2012-09-21 at 10:10 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode