| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
 |
PSU: Hamma Time
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register |
PSU Social
|
|
| Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-02-04, 11:48 AM
|
[Ignore Me] #31 | ||
|
Lieutenant General
|
Why is it the analysis of The Crown usualy ignores the fact you're always fighting two zergs, no matter who's side you're on?
A. 1/3 tries to hold it. B. 1/3 tries to take it. C. 1/3 tries to take it. A + B face off with C. A + C face off with B. B + C face off with A. Nobody can win the ~66.67% enemy threat, thus A stays where it is and can't break out, while none of the attackers can dislodge A as they're to busy preventing that to happen in favour of the other attacking party from any good footholds that might lead to that. |
||
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode