Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
PSU: You have gained 100 BEP for reading this quote.
Forums | Chat | News | Contact Us | Register | PSU Social |
Home | Forum | Chat | Wiki | Social | AGN | PS2 Stats |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2013-05-25, 11:36 AM | [Ignore Me] #11 | |||
Corporal
|
Wow some interseting news.
But, as the pessimistic guy I'm, I just want to ask something with that type of infantery area only. What to do with vehicules you pop 2min before ?
Will be interesting to return deconstruct button, returning ressources (with a ratio for damage) and timer. But devs don't like deconstruct button cause to many people use it prevent the destruction of the vehicule, so what ? Just had a timer of 20s (?) when deconstructing with the same mecanism has redeploy button (don't shoot and don't take damage). Oups I lost the main thread idea. So they want some infantery only place. Why not, but as already said in this thread, why use vehicules so ? Better idea would have to had "roads" for vehicules who allow to have vehicules in some place on bases but not every where (and especially near spawn). Like that : It will gave infantery only places and mixed infantery/vehicule places limitating the number of tanks that could shoot at the same time (but will be a C-4 danger place... can't have all solutions ). Speacking about the shield who can lets pass aerial and according to what have been wrote :
And why use floating pillones ? Just use the same system as warpgate ! If they want limited interactions between vehicules and infantery why not make 2/3 levels in lots/each bases ?
But yes ! had a shield on arial pads would be great ! No more snipers when land in emergency landing and repearing. Giving one (small place) where DCA, missiles, and other aerials can't destroy you in 2s when just land). But yes, bigger place will be needed. Last edited by OmegaPREDATOR; 2013-05-25 at 11:50 AM. |
|||
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|